Teams

CHABOT CANYON 40MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-02vs DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0CLost 03
L#1 DoublesFred Kao / Zina Kao vs Maria Debenedetti / Sherman Lin1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTejal Patel / David Rolf vs Christopher Pagel / Charlotte Niel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Weddle / Lawrence Browne vs Gary Sano / Melissa Sano6-7, 1-6
2025-06-14vs DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0CLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Gambatese / Lawrence Browne vs LyLy Kim / David Tang3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesZina Kao / Daniel Botwinick vs Olga Sokolov / Andrew Young6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Weddle / Vivek Verma vs Debra Aurora / Bob Koury1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Tom Green
published
2.92
Fred Kao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
David Rolf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Daniel Botwinick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Baxter Bell
published 3
2.69
Lawrence Browne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Michele Turton
published
2.52
Jenny Weddle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Lisa Eden
published
2.49
Joey Laurent
published
2.42
Zina Kao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Claire Chen Carter
published 2.5
2.22
Ellen Kinoy
published
1.99
Brooke Moller
published 2.5
Edward Feigen
published
Emily Brod
published
Jerome Parmer
published
Rebecca Gambatese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Green
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Fred Kao
26W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
David Rolf
7W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Daniel Botwinick
3W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Baxter Bell
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lawrence Browne
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Michele Turton
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
Jenny Weddle
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lisa Eden
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Joey Laurent
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
Zina Kao
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Claire Chen Carter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Ellen Kinoy
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Brooke Moller
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Edward Feigen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Brod
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jerome Parmer
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Gambatese
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.