Teams

Lifetime - Haladwala/Martinez

2026 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 40 & Over M · W

16 players · average NTRP 3.40 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-25vs Hoover Met - TurnerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHunter Echols / Matt Heydinger vs Craig Alverson / Van Imbragulio3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDanny Martinez / Matt Palco vs Robert Clay / BRIAN Harris6-0, 6-2
2026-06-23vs BH - IngramLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrank Lassiter / Matt Heydinger vs Kevin Carden / Blanton Reed0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHunter Echols / Brian Faircloth vs Tray Ivey / Chad Miller6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatrick Denney / Alexander Slamen vs Warner Huh / Terry Pouncey4-6, 6-7
2026-06-09vs Hoover Met - TurnerLost 02
L#2 DoublesMark Haladwala / Brian Harbison vs Van Imbragulio / Heath Patton5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Denney / John Gifford vs Nilam Patel / Todd Sitton6-7, 3-6
2026-06-04vs BH - IngramLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarrin Waugh / Brian Harbison vs Sean Merchant / Kevin Carden3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Faircloth / Frank Lassiter vs Lobo Tran / MARK TAYLOR2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlexander Slamen / John Gifford vs Tad Templeton / Tony LaRussa4-6, 1-6
2026-05-21vs Hoover Met - TurnerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrian Harbison / Hunter Echols vs Craig Alverson / Jason Blankenship3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDanny Martinez / Matt Palco vs Tim Clanton / BRIAN Harris6-1, 6-2
2026-05-14vs BH - IngramLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrian Shaughn / Matthew Gaston vs Andrew Chambless / Matthew Davis6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatt Heydinger / Brian Harbison vs Tray Ivey / Daryl Ingram6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesZachary Barnes / Alexander Slamen vs Tony LaRussa / Danny Slovensky1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hoover Met - Turner4210818149
2Lifetime - Haladwala/Martinez0641430196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Shaughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Matthew Gaston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Jay Gilchrist
published
3.36
Brian Faircloth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Matt Heydinger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Hunter Echols
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Danny Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.16
Frank Lassiter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Brian Harbison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Patrick Denney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Matt Palco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Alexander Slamen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Mark Haladwala
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Zachary Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
John Gifford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Darrin Waugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Denney + Alexander Slamen5262% games+7.4% vs expected
Frank Lassiter + Alexander Slamen224 matchesnot enough data
Danny Martinez + Patrick Denney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Shaughn
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Gaston
22W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Jay Gilchrist
22W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Brian Faircloth
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Matt Heydinger
44W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.35
Hunter Echols
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
3
Danny Martinez
37W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
Frank Lassiter
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Brian Harbison
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Patrick Denney
43W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Matt Palco
64W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Alexander Slamen
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Mark Haladwala
34W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Zachary Barnes
41W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
John Gifford
4W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Darrin Waugh
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.