Teams

Th.Roschel18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-30vs Je.Jones18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesAnne Newton vs Jessica Jones6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNicole Nemmers vs Beth Stagner2-6, 5-7
2026-07-21vs Ke.O'Rourke18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesErin Maher vs Shannon Grady4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Em.Rubin18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesThassia Roschel vs Genevieve Daurity6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Molly Clark2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Brandy Presti6-2, 7-5
2026-06-24vs Cl.Duff18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Claire Duff6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesThassia Roschel vs Anne Ward2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesOlivia Hollingsworth vs Kristen Patch6-4, 6-2
2026-06-17vs Sa.Kane18S3.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Lauren Kane6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAnne Newton vs Melis Hamevi Bukey6-0, 6-1
2026-06-10vs Na.Ivey18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesErin Maher vs Sarah Powers6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNicole Nemmers vs Ashley Resta1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Je.Jones18S7016513160
2Ly.Summitt18S7119513169
3Ma.Basil18S7117717181
4Me.Campbell18S5213819154
5Th.Roschel18S5213819162
6Cl.Duff18S5212920174
7Be.Pegram18S53141024204
8St.Styers18S53121230224
9Em.Rubin18S4314715146
10Ta.Yasin18S3.034111021171
11Na.Ivey18S34101123178
12Ca.Wilborne18S35121226208
13Sa.BrodyMoses18S2591226206
14El.Schacht18S2671735240
15St.Fogarty18S2651940250
16Ke.O'Rourke18S1661534219
17Sa.Kane18S3.01641736228
18Ca.Aden18S0871734236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Thassia Roschel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Olivia Hollingsworth
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Erin Maher
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.60
Anne Newton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.60
Jessica Tyndall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.59
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.32
Nicole Nemmers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Steinhardt + Thassia Roschel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Thassia Roschel
45W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Olivia Hollingsworth
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Erin Maher
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Anne Newton
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
49W–70L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.60
3
Mandy Steinhardt
53W–90L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Nicole Nemmers
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.