Teams

Mayfair/St Clair (Anna Alvarez)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.5 Women (DeAnna Emborski)

19 players · average NTRP 4.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (DeAnna Emborski) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Marielba Zambrano
published
4.37
Kate Grosch
published
4.36
Martha Fair
published
4.34
Jennifer Beebe
published
4.30
Katie Weaver
published
Ashley Kuehnne
published 4.5
4.21
Tammy Johnston
published
4.20
Heather Rodriguez
published
4.19
Ryane Davis
published
4.17
Forrest Bohannon
published
4.14
Guicela Leal
published
4.10
Peggy McCarthey
published
4.04
Lydia Covaliu
published
3.99
Laurie Schmidt
published
3.99
Katherine Kardian
published
3.99
Elsa Cecilia Gomez
published
3.91
Anna Alvarez
published 4
3.80
Melissa Haley
published
Kathy Blake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Blake + Lydia Covaliu5157% games+8.3% vs expected
Jennifer Beebe + Tammy Johnston4164% games+6.2% vs expected
Martha Fair + Jennifer Beebe7358% games+5.1% vs expected
Forrest Bohannon + Jennifer Beebe10357% games+4.1% vs expected
Peggy McCarthey + Heather Rodriguez4546% games−2.3% vs expected
Kate Grosch + Heather Rodriguez4647% games−8.6% vs expected
Kate Grosch + Anna Alvarez3450% games−10.1% vs expected
Peggy McCarthey + Kathy Blake134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marielba Zambrano
45W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
4.37
Kate Grosch
44W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Martha Fair
30W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.36
Jennifer Beebe
47W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
Katie Weaver
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Ashley Kuehnne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Johnston
56W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Heather Rodriguez
26W–27L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Ryane Davis
42W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Forrest Bohannon
48W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
4.17
Guicela Leal
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Peggy McCarthey
22W–27L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.10
Lydia Covaliu
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Laurie Schmidt
27W–23L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
Katherine Kardian
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
Elsa Cecilia Gomez
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Anna Alvarez
45W–33L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Melissa Haley
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Kathy Blake
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.