Teams

Hawaiian Punch

2026 Adult 18 and Over League · 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-04vs All That RacquetSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMona Decrinis / Tracy Halbersleben vs Cynthia Funai / Juliana Massenburg3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHannah Carrigan vs Princess Ramos6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dorenzo / Leslie Haughney vs Gage Beerer / shar martin6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNani Ehlinger / Anne Riley vs Rowena Nikki Baysa / Ellen Huss6-3, 6-4
2026-06-20vs Group TherapyLost 12
W#1 DoublesCrystal Graves / Petra Dupont vs Catherine Hall / Jeanne Dunn6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dorenzo / Anne Riley vs Kimberly Kong / Pamela Dolin6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLiezl Lao / Jessica Benson vs Karla Nutt / Daisy Finch0-6, 4-6
2026-06-13vs All That RacquetWon 31
W#1 DoublesLeslie Haughney / Mona Decrinis vs Lori Tanaka / Gage Beerer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHannah Carrigan vs Princess Ramos6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCrystal Graves / Tracy Halbersleben vs Cynthia Funai / Kandy Grantz6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLindsay Worrell vs shar martin6-4, 6-3
2026-06-06vs Group TherapyWon 32
W#1 DoublesCrystal Graves / Petra Dupont vs Jill Kanahele / Shara Wolfe6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs Tamara Farwig6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMona Decrinis / Leslie Haughney vs Catherine Hall / Deanna DiBiase7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLindsay Worrell vs Karen Sullivan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEveline Wunder / Nani Ehlinger vs Pamela Dolin / Kimberly Kong4-6, 0-6
2026-05-30vs All That RacquetWon 41
W#1 DoublesCrystal Graves / Petra Dupont vs Nalani Cagasan / Marisa Fujimoto6-4, 2-0
W#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs Gage Beerer6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLiezl Lao / Fa'Aiuga Ratterman vs Cynthia Funai / Juliana Massenburg5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHannah Carrigan vs shar martin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMona Decrinis / Lindsay Worrell vs Princess Ramos / Lori Tanaka2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-28vs Group TherapyWon 41
W#1 DoublesCrystal Graves / Mona Decrinis vs Deanna DiBiase / Brooke von Tempsky5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs Karla Nutt6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLiezl Lao / Eveline Wunder vs Jill Kanahele / Shara Wolfe4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLindsay Worrell vs Tamara Farwig6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJessica Benson / Julia Kinchen vs Kimberly Kong / Mikayla Lau1-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hawaiian Punch6021924214
2All That Racquet06102044307

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Petra Dupont
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Tracy Halbersleben
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.86
Lindsay Worrell
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Crystal Graves
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Hannah Carrigan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.74
Mona Decrinis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Leslie Haughney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Nani Ehlinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Liezl Lao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Deborah Dorenzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Fa'Aiuga Ratterman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Anne Riley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Eveline Wunder
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Jessica Benson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julia Kinchen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Dorenzo + Leslie Haughney16663% games−5.5% vs expected
Mona Decrinis + Leslie Haughney2339% games−8.6% vs expected
Tracy Halbersleben + Mona Decrinis3642% games−16.1% vs expected
Tracy Halbersleben + Deborah Dorenzo2344% gamesnot enough data
Mona Decrinis + Petra Dupont134 matchesnot enough data
Crystal Graves + Petra Dupont303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Petra Dupont
103W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.05
4
Tracy Halbersleben
48W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Lindsay Worrell
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Crystal Graves
47W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Hannah Carrigan
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Mona Decrinis
102W–125L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Leslie Haughney
80W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Nani Ehlinger
32W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Liezl Lao
41W–129L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Deborah Dorenzo
36W–31L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
Fa'Aiuga Ratterman
32W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Anne Riley
10W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Eveline Wunder
61W–50L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Jessica Benson
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julia Kinchen
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.