Teams

SoCal/Barbarie/18&Over10.0XD

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 10.0

13 players · average NTRP 5.08 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-29vs SD 10.0 Peninsula TC/ BrownLost 12
W#1 DoublesSanem Ahearn / Adam Levie vs Leire Martinez Barredo / Matthew Roberts6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoseph Barbarie / Carlota P LeFon vs Kyla Kotcherha / Robert Liu3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCassidy Ferrell / Derek Miller vs Lindsay Brown / Jesse Donahue2-6, 2-6
2025-03-28vs SD 10.0 Peninsula TC/ BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesMillie Yablonicky / Lawrence Chan vs Lindsay Brown / Jesse Donahue4-6, 3-6
2025-03-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesMitchel Heckmann / Millie Yablonicky vs Kyra Scott / Jacob Roberts7-5, 6-3
2025-03-01vs SD 10.0 Peninsula TC/ BrownWon 10
W#2 DoublesMillie Yablonicky / Simon Shen vs Leire Martinez Barredo / Matthew Roberts6-2, 6-1
2025-02-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMillie Yablonicky / Simon Shen vs Kyra Scott / Jacob Roberts3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 10.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.23
Cassidy Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5.5
5.04
Millie Yablonicky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
5.00
Carlota P LeFon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.93
Sanem Ahearn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brent Davis
published 5
4.68
Adam Levie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.66
Brian Espinoza
published 5
Hannah Holladay
published
Jana McCord
published
Joseph Barbarie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lawrence Chan
published
Mitchel Heckmann
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Cassidy Ferrell
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
5.23
5
Millie Yablonicky
71W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.04
5
Carlota P LeFon
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
5.00
Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.93
5
Brent Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Adam Levie
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
5
Brian Espinoza
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.66
Hannah Holladay
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jana McCord
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Barbarie
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Perl Lancaster
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lawrence Chan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitchel Heckmann
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.