Teams

STL-Reg- McGowan/18&Over7.0MXD

18 & Over Mixed- Sept. 9-11 · 7.0 MXD

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK-Reg-Ogle-Pappas000000
2STL-Reg- McGowan/18&Over7.0MXD000000
3HOA-REG-Abel/18&Over7.0MXD000000
4NE-Reg - Studts/Erwin000000
5MO-WC1-Cabrera000000
6IA-REG-000000
7MO-Reg-Kim/18&Over7.0MXD000000
8KS-REG-Bharati/Solovey/18&Over7.0MXD000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Michael O'Neill
published
3.88
Jacob Sandweiss
published 4
3.81
Nicholas de Haan
published
3.80
Wesley Law
published
3.75
Michelle Hoxsey
published
3.37
Kara Sair
published
3.03
Renee Breer
published
2.93
Nicholas Damato
published
Carmen Chee
published 3
John McGowan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John McGowan + Michelle Hoxsey123 matchesnot enough data
Renee Breer + Nicholas de Haan213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hoxsey + Wesley Law303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael O'Neill
66W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Jacob Sandweiss
130W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Nicholas de Haan
84W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Wesley Law
121W–84L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
Michelle Hoxsey
100W–66L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Kara Sair
43W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Renee Breer
36W–49L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Nicholas Damato
55W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Carmen Chee
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John McGowan
49W–63L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.