Teams

RCC RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-07vs TTA-E REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Troudt / Amanda Sarti vs Tanya Jones / Jessica Marten1-6, 4-6
2023-08-31vs CVTA PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Emily Miller vs Marsha Ruggeri / Christina Davies6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSara Wang / Laura Troudt vs Kristen Keller / Jennifer Hotka6-0, 6-2
2023-08-24vs BCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMandy Sutton / Laura Troudt vs Paige Walker / Alana Malone2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Zahner / Madison Walz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-10vs LAC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Emily Miller vs Christy Hilmas / Amy Grolnick6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlana MacY / Madison Walz vs Stacy Welding / MARY WEISFOUT7-5, 6-4
2023-08-03vs TTA-E REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesRilla Baca / Chrissy Hasek vs Jessica Marten / Naomi Fahrner6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlana MacY / Madison Walz vs Viji Duncan / Cynthia Davis6-1, 6-0
2023-07-27vs CVTA PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Madison Walz vs Christina Davies / Kristen Keller6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Chrissy Hasek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Sara Wang
published
2.75
Madison Walz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Laura Troudt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Rilla Baca
published
2.60
Alana MacY
published 3
2.34
Mandy Sutton
published
Amanda Sarti
published 2.5
1.82
Tracy Zahner
published
Naomi Gaeng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Sutton + Laura Troudt404 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Zahner + Laura Troudt213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Wang + Laura Troudt213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Wang + Alana MacY303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chrissy Hasek
85W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Sara Wang
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Madison Walz
34W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Laura Troudt
31W–29L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
Rilla Baca
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alana MacY
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Mandy Sutton
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Amanda Sarti
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Zahner
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Naomi Gaeng
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.