Teams

LOCH.Hendricks

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-10vs ANP.MullinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Froseth / Kimberly Shames vs Monica Venkateswaran / Megan Prieto6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Hendricks / Pam Letts vs Lauren Doyle / Kendall Ogren6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Nolfi / Katie Austin vs Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre / Linda Wasmund7-5, 6-2
2026-08-29vs BENT.WagnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Shames / Katie Nolfi vs Ana Santiago / Katarzyna Mazur6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Austin / Andrea Finucane vs Sallie Corse / Jackie Obediente3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Dannels / Marie Willis vs Taylor Froehlich / Jordan Golden6-1, 7-5
2026-08-20vs MD.BosticWon 21
L#1 DoublesPam Letts / Andrea Finucane vs Melissa Keener / Annie Pilz2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Froseth / Katie Nolfi vs Elizabeth Stanton / Jennifer Crumpler6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarie Willis / Heather Dannels vs Martha Martinez / Victoria Helms6-1, 6-1
2026-08-14vs ANP.MullinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Finucane / Pam Letts vs Arin Vaughan / Monica Venkateswaran1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Nolfi / Heather Dannels vs Sarah Lewis / Lauren Doyle1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Froseth / Kimberly Shames vs Michele Chambers / Linda Wasmund6-2, 6-1
2026-07-30vs MCP.McGovernLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Nolfi / Laura Froseth vs Tomoko Tomoyose / Kim Rice4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPam Letts / Heather Dannels vs Jonay Zies / Jennifer McGovern3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Finucane / Marie Willis vs Ji Kim / Elena Stimmel4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ANP.Mullins3072667
2MCP.McGovern1142445
3LOCH.Hendricks12361279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Laura Froseth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Katie Austin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Ashley Hendricks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.38
Kimberly Shames
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Marie Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Andrea Finucane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
Katie Nolfi
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.29
Pam Letts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.03
Heather Dannels
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Finucane + Katie Austin213 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Finucane + Pam Letts033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Shames + Ashley Hendricks303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Nolfi + Heather Dannels033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Froseth
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.55
Katie Austin
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Ashley Hendricks
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
Kimberly Shames
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
Marie Willis
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Andrea Finucane
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Katie Nolfi
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
Pam Letts
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Heather Dannels
2W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.