Teams

Topspinners Tri-Level

Tri-Level League · Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men Central

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NEW JERSEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 upcoming
Sep 12 8:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club
Sep 19 8:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club
Sep 26 8:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club
Oct 3 8:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club
Oct 10 8:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club
Oct 17 10:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club
Oct 24 9:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club
Oct 31 9:30 AM
vs
Princeton Racquet Club

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men Central have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jegan Podhanur
published
3.71
Gaurav Vachher
published 4
3.64
3.57
3.54
Dhruv Bhatt
published 3.5
3.44
Jigar Shah
published
3.35
Anil Ghelani
published 3.5
3.33
Niraj Shukla
published
2.95
Dheeraj Misra
published 3
2.88
Sridhar Kolluri
published
Bob Kumar
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niraj Shukla + Dhruv Bhatt4163% games+6.5% vs expected
Thulasiraja Kandaswamy + Gaurav Vachher4654% games+0.1% vs expected
Anil Ghelani + Niraj Shukla2346% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jegan Podhanur
104W–42L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Gaurav Vachher
57W–47L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Thulasiraja Kandaswamy
73W–86L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Rajaneesha Srinivasa
57W–49L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dhruv Bhatt
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Jigar Shah
90W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Anil Ghelani
126W–133L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
Niraj Shukla
49W–38L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Dheeraj Misra
49W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sridhar Kolluri
16W–53L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Bob Kumar
6W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.