Teams

RCSP Rippers

2023 Pinellas Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 MXD

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-12vs Pinellas/Martinez/40&Over8.0XLost 02
L#2 DoublesShelly Watkins / Steven Friedman vs Casey Gates / Peter Marsocci0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCathrine Chin / Alan Chin vs Natalie Martinez / Joseph Richards4-6, 2-6
2023-02-26vs Seminole Lake TimminsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoe Faraci / Shelly Watkins vs Brian Hodapp / Debra Hinners3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Chin / Cathrine Chin vs Mauricio Caccia / Gina Timmins0-6, 3-6
2023-02-19vs Safety Harbor PasinskiLost 01
L#3 DoublesKen Degen / Shelly Watkins vs John Hockin / Amy Brooks1-6, 6-7
2023-02-05vs Tarpon DiSalvio MXDLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlan Chin / Cathrine Chin vs Peter Martino / Tori Disalvio3-6, 4-6
2023-01-08vs Pinellas/Martinez/40&Over8.0XLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Faraci / Shelly Watkins vs Felipe Martinez / Nina Mortazavi4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Cindy Hendriks
published 4
Douglas Hicks
published 4
3.71
James Price
published 4
3.56
Kristin Blair
published
3.56
Joe Faraci
published
3.53
Alan Chin
published 3.5
3.50
Shelly Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Steven Friedman
published
3.34
Roger Blair
published
3.33
Cathrine Chin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barry Michael
published 3.5
3.12
Ken Degen
published
Brian Mannari
published 3
Nini Torres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Chin + Cathrine Chin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Hendriks
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Douglas Hicks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
James Price
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
Kristin Blair
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Joe Faraci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Alan Chin
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Shelly Watkins
72W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Steven Friedman
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Roger Blair
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Cathrine Chin
86W–124L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Barry Michael
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Degen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Brian Mannari
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nini Torres
54W–39L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.