Teams

Service With a Smile (Team 1)

2026 Winter Coed (2025) · Mixed Draft

7 players · average NTRP 3.14 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-14vs Called to Serve (Team 4)Won 32
L#1 Female DoublesELIZE Rumley / Irene Zhang vs Kathryn Hoke / Catherine Stone2-4
W#1 Female SinglesMichelle Dietz vs Kelsey Wilcox4-3
L#1 Male DoublesAaron Hudson / Elliott Hoel vs Eric Jostsons / James Robinson3-4
W#1 Male SinglesNoah Whitney vs Gregory Deemer5-3
W#1 Mixed DoublesMichelle Dietz / Willy Stone vs Kathryn Hoke / Eric Jostsons4-1
2025-12-13vs Lob 'em & Leave 'em (Team 2)Lost 14
L#1 Female DoublesELIZE Rumley / Irene Zhang vs Stacia Green / Christie Wyzykowski1-4
W#1 Female SinglesMichelle Dietz vs Christie Wyzykowski5-2
L#1 Male DoublesAaron Hudson / Willy Stone vs Jay Green / Patrick Rumley3-4
L#1 Male SinglesNoah Whitney vs Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian2-4
L#2 Mixed DoublesElliott Hoel / ELIZE Rumley vs Jay Green / Christie Wyzykowski3-5
2025-12-13vs Drop Shot Like it's Hot (Team 3)Lost 13
L#1 Female DoublesMichelle Dietz / Irene Zhang vs April Korshin / Julie Raymond-Yakoubian1-6
L#1 Female SinglesELIZE Rumley vs April Korshin1-6
L#1 Male DoublesNoah Whitney / Elliott Hoel vs Richard Clendaniel / Korey Perry3-5
W#1 Male SinglesWilly Stone vs Korey Perry5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed Draft have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aaron Hudson
published 4
3.67
ELIZE Rumley
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Noah Whitney
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #1 Male Doubles 33%, also #1 Male Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Michelle Dietz
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.21
Irene Zhang
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Elliott Hoel
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliott Hoel + Irene Zhang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aaron Hudson
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
ELIZE Rumley
56W–59L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.67
3.5
Noah Whitney
5W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Michelle Dietz
25W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
2.5
Irene Zhang
0W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Elliott Hoel
3W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.