Teams

SD 4.0WE University City RC/ Jernigan

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-05vs SD 4.0WE Mountain View/ KilleenLost 01
L#1 SinglesLyn Balagtas vs Bea McLellan1-6, 2-6
2022-05-22vs SD 4.0WE Coronado TC/ WebsterLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Hamric / Lyn Balagtas vs Jillian Gee / Gladys Esponda2-6, 1-6
2022-05-15vs SD 4.0WE SDTRC/ MamerLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusie Schwaiger / Lyn Balagtas vs Adelle Danson / Sandy Dielman5-7, 5-7
2022-04-10vs SD 4.0WE Coronado TC/ WebsterLost 01
L#2 DoublesLyn Balagtas / Kelly Jernigan vs Jill Webster / Vivian McAnally1-6, 4-6
2022-04-03vs SD 4.0WE SDTRC/ MamerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLyn Balagtas / Kim Latham vs Lindy Mamer / Sandy Dielman2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Nina Keller
published
3.72
3.65
Kristin Adams
published
3.64
Maria Ward
published
3.64
Kim Latham
published
3.60
Sarah Jensen
published
3.51
Amy Hamric
published 3.5
3.23
Lyn Balagtas
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nina Keller
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4
Denysse Castaneda
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Kristin Adams
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Maria Ward
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
Kim Latham
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Sarah Jensen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Amy Hamric
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Lyn Balagtas
24W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.