Teams

LBKO-Kosior/Edgemoor

2024 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-06Won 20
W#2 DoublesTeresa Pal / Tracey McKenna vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Peacock / Stephanie Clancy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-29vs LVWE-Weber/WestportLost 03
L#1 DoublesDina White / Filomena Ferri vs Christy Bolick / Shaun Simmer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJane Heredia / Tracey McKenna vs Helen Bugg / Jennie Carruth1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill Hulse-Mack / Diane Pfeil vs Becky Heflin / Lori Chriscoe1-6, 2-6
2024-04-22vs LKED-Edge /RRWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnnie Edenfield / Barbara Kosior vs Mary Kennedy / Kimberly Robbins4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSHARON WELLS / Elizabeth Holum vs Janet Scott / Patricia Sharawy6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFilomena Ferri / Karen Allison vs Karen Edge / Tracey Marchitelli6-3, 6-4
2024-04-08vs LKDZ-Dziadziola/CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Hulse-Mack / Alison Siebold vs Leta Wiley / Odette Baker1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSHARON WELLS / Carolyn Peacock vs Karen Dziadziola / LuAnne Pate6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Allison / Jane Heredia vs Martha Wells / Kathy Henry7-5, 6-1
2024-03-18vs LCST-Staab/PACWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kosior / Annie Edenfield vs Sherry Avnayim / Madeleine Glover6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDina White / Alison Siebold vs Christine Nilson / Elizabeth Norton4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFilomena Ferri / Diane Pfeil vs Pamela Bender / Lois Forti7-5, 6-3
2024-03-11vs LMBR-Bruce/JettonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kosior / Teresa Pal vs Elizabeth Foreman / Nancy Zylstra1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFilomena Ferri / Annie Edenfield vs Kira Skill / Louise Brown3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Hulse-Mack / Stephanie Clancy vs Debbie Beam / Sharon Cantey3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Annie Edenfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
SHARON WELLS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Barbara Kosior
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Filomena Ferri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.56
Alison Siebold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Teresa Pal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Karen Allison
published
3.48
Carolyn Peacock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Stephanie Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Dina White
published
3.41
Tracey McKenna
published
3.31
Jane Heredia
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jill Hulse-Mack
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Holum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Filomena Ferri + Carolyn Peacock9363% games+8.8% vs expected
Stephanie Clancy + Barbara Kosior11262% games+7.1% vs expected
SHARON WELLS + Barbara Kosior11357% games+4.9% vs expected
Annie Edenfield + SHARON WELLS6351% games+4.5% vs expected
Filomena Ferri + Annie Edenfield141751% games+1.2% vs expected
Filomena Ferri + Stephanie Clancy141849% games+1.1% vs expected
Stephanie Clancy + Carolyn Peacock13361% games+0.6% vs expected
Stephanie Clancy + Annie Edenfield91746% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annie Edenfield
179W–130L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
SHARON WELLS
119W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Barbara Kosior
145W–132L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Filomena Ferri
135W–125L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.59
4
Alison Siebold
71W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Teresa Pal
142W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Karen Allison
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Carolyn Peacock
86W–51L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.48
3.5
Stephanie Clancy
222W–140L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Dina White
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Tracey McKenna
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Jane Heredia
134W–121L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Jill Hulse-Mack
70W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Elizabeth Holum
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.