Teams

MTC 7.5 Mixed Miracles - Crews

2025 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-22vs MAC Scott 7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesFahim Rahman / Pamela Stidham vs Laurie Malheiros / Roger Wisor6-0, 7-6
2025-11-08vs ACAC Lewis/Flournoy 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Stidham / Pamela Stidham vs Tommy Bader / Kelley Kent4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-26vs Avalon Williamson 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Stidham / Chris Pecci vs Kelly Stalls / Chris Giacchi4-6, 2-6
2025-10-11vs Burkwood Colgin 7.5 Combo MixLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Kochensparger / Pamela Stidham vs Jennifer Owens / Brandon Malone0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Jennifer Shaffer
published
3.64
Juan Loza
published
3.55
Chris Pecci
published 4
3.53
3.48
Noelle Crews
published
3.46
Pamela Stidham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.22
Timea Harisova
published
3.21
Amanda Mayhew
published 3.5
3.13
Tracy Marks
published
3.05
CONSTANCE MATTOX
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Fahim Rahman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CONSTANCE MATTOX + Christopher Kochensparger5550% games+4.7% vs expected
Tracy Marks + Noelle Crews224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Shaffer
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Christopher Kochensparger
22W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Juan Loza
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Chris Pecci
7W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Christopher Stidham
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Noelle Crews
37W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
4
Pamela Stidham
62W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Timea Harisova
33W–19L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amanda Mayhew
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
CONSTANCE MATTOX
29W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Fahim Rahman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.