Teams

I’d Hit That 4.0M Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesJose Miguel Sacin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-17vs KG 4.0M SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesJuan Jose Tijero vs Alexander Gerson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-10-11vs KG 4.0M SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesJuan Jose Tijero vs Matt Galosky1-6, 6-7
2023-10-02vs KTA 4.0M SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesJuan Jose Tijero vs Patrick Orwig5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJose Miguel Sacin vs Rizwan Rashid6-0, 6-4
2023-09-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesJuan Jose Tijero vs DONALD CRAWLEY7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Hector Barrera
published 4.5
3.92
Jose Miguel Sacin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.89
Jay Anzures
published
3.75
Dharmesh Patel
published 4
3.72
Juan Jose Tijero
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.64
Jim Leveque
published 4
3.56
Gabriel Silverman
published 3.5
3.47
Sean Alewine
published
3.45
Jamil Abdur-Raoof
published 3.5
3.38
Larry Wall
published
3.09
Tim Munshell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Yuji Ohno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Jose Tijero + Jose Miguel Sacin7162% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hector Barrera
20W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
4
Jose Miguel Sacin
232W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
Jay Anzures
23W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Dharmesh Patel
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Juan Jose Tijero
606W–366L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Jim Leveque
172W–202L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Gabriel Silverman
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.56
Sean Alewine
29W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Jamil Abdur-Raoof
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
Larry Wall
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Tim Munshell
360W–260L career · 1 line in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.09
Yuji Ohno
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.