Teams

No Drama Llamas-Jacobson/Shanahan

2024 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-01vs MartinLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Laabs / Amy Dawson vs Masako Murphy / Maria Birnkammer4-6, 1-6
2024-06-29vs Lady TigersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Laabs / Elizabeth Jacobson vs Andrea Motley / Lisa Seamancrawford6-3, 6-4
2024-06-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesLynne Powell / Laura Laabs vs Mylene Kempers / Kathy Brady6-1, 6-1
2024-06-20vs MartinLost 01
L#3 DoublesElle Shanahan / Leann Gibbs vs Rebecca Sellassie / Jenny Lopez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-02vs Lady TigersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynne Powell / Leann Gibbs vs Stephanie Freeman / Tina Young6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEllyn McLaughlin / Miriam Mellin vs Deborah Thompson / Ingrid Turner2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-21vs HillSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEllyn McLaughlin / Melissa Donato vs Kim Taft / Karen Yannone4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeann Gibbs / Jennifer Cohen vs Christina Ravekes / Donna Guarino3-6, 2-6
2024-04-23vs HillSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Dawson / Laura Laabs vs Kim Taft / Bonnie Muheim7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Knoll / Leann Gibbs vs Margarete Wolk / Heather Dodd3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Dale Clark
published 3.5
3.44
Lynne Powell
published
3.30
Ellyn McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Laura Laabs
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.25
Leann Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Elizabeth Jacobson
published
2.94
Jennifer Mason
published
2.71
Erika Cadori
published 3
Kelley Israel
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Jacobson + Dale Clark6650% games+3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dale Clark
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Lynne Powell
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Ellyn McLaughlin
89W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Laura Laabs
177W–206L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Leann Gibbs
98W–77L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Elizabeth Jacobson
29W–29L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Jennifer Mason
1W–16L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Erika Cadori
33W–26L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Kelley Israel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.