Teams

KY/LOU/JONES/MENTING

2026 USTA COMBO 18 & OVER LOUISVILLE · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 13 4:00 PM
Plainview Tennis Center
Sep 19 4:00 PM
Louisville Tennis Club
2026-08-21vs KY/LOU/DALTONLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Jones / Michelle Menting vs Karen Weathers / Cecelia Bland3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshley McCoy / Kim DeVries vs Mechelle Kaufman / Whitney Barnes3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Nolan / Jessica Scheiner vs Julianne Powell-Sutton / Sydney Marquette2-6, 6-7
2026-08-09vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrittany Burt / Emily Nolan vs Kelley Roberts / Bridgette Gorman4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Stone / Rachel Fowler vs Hannah Sencindiver / Mary Jennings4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Culver / Linda Ross vs Becca Haynes / Shelby Fill6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-31vs KY/LOU/MEAGHERWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Burt / Karen Griffin vs Kim Riley / Debbie Widman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley McCoy / Linda Ross vs Jennifer Jorden / Michelle Winebrenner2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Stone / Beth Tinsley vs Deana Paradis / Karen George6-1, 6-1
2026-07-30vs KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Jones / Michelle Menting vs Becky French / Jenny O'Donnell6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Nolan / Rachel Fowler vs Shannon Kessler / Robbyn McClain6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrittany Burt / Elizabeth Curtin vs Catie Wilson / Jacquelyn Obrien6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-25vs KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Menting / Rachel Fowler vs Adrienne Polen / Celina Keehan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Curtin / Jennifer Schultz vs Lilly McGlone / Brooke Bloch1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrittany Burt / Linda Ross vs Alex Hargadon Knauss / Megan Yussman6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/JONES/MENTING226616110
2KY/LOU/DAI/FARRIS0521328172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Michelle Menting
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Ashley McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Mary Culver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Elizabeth Curtin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Brittany Burt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Emily Nolan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Rachel Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Beth Tinsley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Jennifer Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lea Marsh
published
2.72
Kim DeVries
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jessica Scheiner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Irina McGrath
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Burt + Rachel Fowler3255% gamesnot enough data
Kim DeVries + Lea Marsh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Menting
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Ashley McCoy
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mary Culver
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
Elizabeth Curtin
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Brittany Burt
22W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Emily Nolan
12W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Rachel Fowler
23W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Beth Tinsley
17W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jennifer Schultz
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
Lea Marsh
8W–18L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kim DeVries
6W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Jessica Scheiner
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Irina McGrath
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.