Teams

LKWI-Williams/SC

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · W 7.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-10vs LAMichalskiLNTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKarla Williams / Anne Clark vs SHARON WELLS / Amy Michalski1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Jodi Stewart vs Lorelei Hewitt / Kathleen Taylor6-1, 6-4
2022-10-03vs LBKU-Kumar/PACWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Amelia Johnson vs Jolynn Hurley / Pamela Bender6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJane Prichard / Kaye Stokes vs Christine Nilson / Diane Hillery6-2, 6-3
2022-09-19vs LAMichalskiLNTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarla Williams / Amelia Johnson vs SHARON WELLS / Debbie Scott3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-09-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Prichard / Anne Clark vs Jennifer Jenkins / Jolynn Hurley2-6, 2-6
2022-08-29vs LAMichalskiLNTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Anne Clark vs Kathleen Cassino / Carole Catlett6-0, 6-4
2022-08-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesJane Prichard / Anne Clark vs Jolynn Hurley / Margie Walden6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Anne Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.57
Karen Dziadziola
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Karla Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Jane Prichard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Angie Hartsell
published 3.5
3.25
Emily Jones
published 3.5
3.21
Kaye Stokes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karla Williams + Karen Dziadziola18759% games+10.9% vs expected
Anne Clark + Jane Prichard19956% games+7.1% vs expected
Anne Clark + Karla Williams18562% games+4.6% vs expected
Karen Dziadziola + Jane Prichard3250% gamesnot enough data
Karla Williams + Jane Prichard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Clark
82W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.58
4
Karen Dziadziola
206W–143L career · 3 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Karla Williams
377W–168L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
4
Jane Prichard
69W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Angie Hartsell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Emily Jones
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Kaye Stokes
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.