Teams

Moore/3.0/18&O/Ruston/RPAR

2025 Ruston Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-27vs Price/3.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 31
W#1 DoublesEllie Puckett / Emilie Tomlin vs Anna Bates / Tami Johnston6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDionne Nolan vs Brandy Roberson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoan McMaster / Mary Moore vs Ashlea Price / Emma Bowman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Eaton / Mary-Kyle McDonald vs Julie Shirley / Tammy Roberts6-4, 6-2
2025-04-13vs Juneau/3.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmilie Tomlin vs Sarah Keyes Jeffords6-2, 4-1
W#2 DoublesCarla Carter / Karen Rogers vs Ashley Allen / Stefanie Simpson6-3, 6-3
2025-03-23vs Juneau/3.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 50
W#1 DoublesTaylor Weeks / Anh Le vs Anapaula Balestrazzi / Dannah Holtzclaw6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEmilie Tomlin vs Madeline Bridges6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarla Carter / Joan McMaster vs Lori Theis / Jennifer Juneau6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDionne Nolan vs Kari McGuire6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEllie Puckett / Mary-Kyle McDonald vs Jessica Johnson / Jennifer Sanderson6-4, 6-3
2025-03-09vs Price/3.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnh Le / Ellie Puckett vs Tammy Roberts / Shelby Daum6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDionne Nolan vs Emma Bowman6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmilie Tomlin / Karen Rogers vs Regina McNeill / Anna Bates6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Eaton / Mary Moore vs Brittany Sheets / Tami Johnston6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Ellie Puckett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Taylor Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Emilie Tomlin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Carla Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Cindy Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Joan McMaster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dionne Nolan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Mary-Kyle McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellie Puckett
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Taylor Weeks
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Emilie Tomlin
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.84
3
Carla Carter
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Eaton
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
Joan McMaster
11W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Dionne Nolan
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Kyle McDonald
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.