Teams

75 - 40's Wilkinson

2026 Anniston · Gadsden

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings1 teams · Gadsden
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
175 - 40's Wilkinson1030017

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Ann Bergman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Iris Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.12
Melissa Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Wendy Uhrin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Williamson + Iris Wilkinson3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Bergman
7W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Iris Wilkinson
12W–16L career · 13 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Melissa Williamson
8W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Wendy Uhrin
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.