Teams

STAP BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-26vs GTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHunter Hook / Jason Schild vs Roger Montoya / David Baker2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesThane Benedict vs Suresh Gevaran7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJosh Lozow / Eric Kurtz vs Gary Abrams / Frank Koppala5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSteven Ford / Eric Clayman vs Chris Cochrane / Joseph Abdo0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-19vs BP GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesHunter Hook / Eric Kurtz vs Brian Dino / Steve Cannata2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesThane Benedict vs Jeffrey Greenberg4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Ford / John Oettli vs Craig Tierney / Tony Delacruz1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGeorge Tavarez / Gregory Pond vs Jon Mason / Dave Klene7-5, 6-4
2021-07-05vs DTC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesBret Chen / Josh Lozow vs Curtis Turner / David Turner6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesThane Benedict vs John Tolva6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteven Ford / Gregory Pond vs William Nelson / Richard Best3-6, 3-6
2021-06-28vs CM BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesBret Chen / Josh Lozow vs Andrew Goodwillie / Bryan Wright3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJason Schild vs Paul Gillis7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesThane Benedict / Eric Kurtz vs Bruce Anderson / Stan Goodreau6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEric Clayman / John Oettli vs Christopher Frampton / Jeff Robert3-6, 0-6
2021-06-21vs SKY GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesJosh Lozow / Steven Ford vs Blake Johnson / John Lewin6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesThane Benedict vs Gary Williams1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Oettli / George Tavarez vs Rockwell Pearson / Greg Rogers2-6, 1-6
2021-06-15vs EM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJosh Lozow / Gregory Pond vs Jake Tiernan / David May6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJason Schild vs Paul Barben6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesThane Benedict / Steven Ford vs Will Beutelschies / Seth Turner7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHunter Hook / George Tavarez vs Joseph Burke / Daniel Moe7-5, 6-3
2021-06-07vs CP BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesHunter Hook / Thane Benedict vs Thorn Luth / David Morrison1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJason Schild vs Kendall Lin6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJosh Lozow / Eric Kurtz vs Joel Spector / Harry Dorcy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteven Ford / Paul Nicknig vs Jeremy Carman / Tony Church3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Josh Lozow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Eric Clayman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Hunter Hook
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.58
Bret Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Eric Voogt
published 4
3.18
Eric Kurtz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
George Tavarez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gregory Pond
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jason Schild
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
John Oettli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Nicknig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thane Benedict
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Lozow + Bret Chen9752% games−1.9% vs expected
Eric Kurtz + Eric Clayman2344% gamesnot enough data
Eric Kurtz + Josh Lozow044 matchesnot enough data
John Oettli + George Tavarez033 matchesnot enough data
Eric Kurtz + Thane Benedict123 matchesnot enough data
Eric Kurtz + Bret Chen123 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Pond + Josh Lozow213 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Pond + George Tavarez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Josh Lozow
92W–74L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Eric Clayman
26W–31L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Hunter Hook
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%24%76%
3.59
4
Bret Chen
26W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Eric Voogt
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Eric Kurtz
7W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
George Tavarez
5W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gregory Pond
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jason Schild
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Oettli
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Nicknig
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Steven Ford
2W–8L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thane Benedict
20W–22L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.