Teams

South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0M

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-09vs Sports Mall-Nelson/BachmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesClark Layton / Craig Breinholt vs Dean Bachman / Kris Denos1-6, 1-6
2023-08-07vs Sports Mall-OsbornLost 01
L#1 DoublesManoj Gangwar / Michael Christensen vs Ron Burnside / Ronald Zimmerman0-6, 0-6
2023-08-05vs Cottonwood Club-Arico/RuprechtLost 01
L#1 DoublesClark Layton / Bill Larkin vs Howard Davis / Karl Kieffer1-6, 3-6
2023-07-19vs Sports Mall-PachecoLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Larkin / Clark Layton vs Kenneth Marz / Andrew McCubbins2-6, 0-6
2023-07-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-BalchWon 10
W#2 DoublesClark Layton / Rodayne Esmay vs Larry Richie / Timothy Jeffryes6-1, 6-2
2023-06-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-Heller/SoffeLost 02
L#1 DoublesBill Larkin / Devin Anderson vs STEVE MATSEN / Reyn Soffe0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClark Layton / Craig Breinholt vs Carl Culver / Sameer Bhadouria1-6, 2-6
2023-06-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-NoyceLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Christensen / Clark Layton vs Doug Bisig / Douglas Kruithof1-6, 0-6
2023-06-21vs Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/FolletteSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDevin Anderson / Craig Breinholt vs David Seaman / Charles Williams6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesManoj Gangwar / Clark Layton vs Brian Smith / Ben Jones4-6, 1-6
2023-06-14vs Liberty Park Tennis-VisserWon 20
W#2 DoublesDevin Anderson / Manoj Gangwar vs Jeff Petersen / John Love6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClark Layton / Michael Christensen vs Daniel Mangum / George Burdick6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Salt Lake Tennis-Heller/Soffe72251126242
2South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin2772959374

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clark Layton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Devin Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bill Larkin
published
Craig Breinholt
published
Edward Thomas
published
Manoj Gangwar
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Thomas
published
Rodayne Esmay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Thomas + Mark Thomas81446% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clark Layton
13W–38L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Devin Anderson
14W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Bill Larkin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Craig Breinholt
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Edward Thomas
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Manoj Gangwar
2W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Thomas
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rodayne Esmay
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.