← Teams

MAC-Humpage/Eisen

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Glenn Eisen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Tony Humpage
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Dirk Jacobs
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Mark Meyer
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
John Nee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
—
Marc Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Raimund Grube
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 0
—
Stephen Mileham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Vasilios Garyfallou
published 0
Results6 ties
2020-03-01Lost 0–5
L#1 DoublesMarc Alexander / Stephen Mileham vs Dan Wolff / William Hertford6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJohn Nee vs Anil Khanna6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTony Humpage / Tim Findlay vs George Husbands / Jeff Anhaltzer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMark Meyer vs Jeffrey Gates6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Matthew Casimo vs Carl McConnell / Paul Barner6-1, 6-3
2020-02-22Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTim Findlay / Marc Alexander vs Vidyanand Kulkarni / Shanu Shaharuvan Sukoor6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRaimund Grube vs Dinesh Jayaraj6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChip Burczak / Jeffrey Bayless vs Sanjoy Ganguly / Vivek Kashyap4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2020-02-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTony Humpage / Stephen Mileham vs Robert Wise / David Butts6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Matthew Casimo vs Robert Shevlin / Dan Wendling6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMark Meyer vs Eric Thompson6-3, 6-3
2020-02-01Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesStephen Mileham / Tony Humpage vs Kyle McGovern / Huy Bui6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Glenn Eisen vs Peter Hoang / John Nguyen6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRaimund Grube vs Scott Naugler6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDirk Jacobs / Pat Nevin vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / Nate Larsen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2020-01-18Lost 0–5
L#1 DoublesMarc Alexander / Stephen Mileham vs Gabriel Weaver / Joey Lin6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRaimund Grube vs Kenya Reutin6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMark Meyer / Dave Hall vs Jeff Lipke / Jason Dortch2-0
L#2 SinglesDirk Jacobs vs Stefan Olander6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMatthew Lundeberg / Matthew Casimo vs Marko Radosavljevic / Kerry Jantzi6-2, 7-5
2020-01-04Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesTony Humpage / Stephen Mileham vs Hoover Li / Paul Kachel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGlenn Eisen / Dirk Jacobs vs Ryan Manwiller / Robert Truong2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMark Meyer vs PHAT Lee3-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Pat Nevin vs Mike Chen / John Liao2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Glenn Eisen
57W–50L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tony Humpage
99W–73L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Dirk Jacobs
53W–32L career
22%77%1%
3.12
3.5
Mark Meyer
37W–43L career
22%78%0%
3.07
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
John Nee
38W–66L career
not enough data
—
0
Marc Alexander
17W–22L career
not enough data
—
0
Raimund Grube
9W–24L career
not enough data
—
0
Stephen Mileham
35W–28L career
not enough data
—
0
Vasilios Garyfallou
9W–19L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.