Teams

JThaker (BCC)

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-06vs ACheek/KLoor (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Reitz / Chantal Powers vs Doris Rahman / Yvonne Ceran4-6, 2-6
2025-09-29vs EKyle (FCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Derrico / Melodie Ohaus vs Lorna O'Callaghan / Deborah Todd4-6, 2-6
2025-09-15vs JZangmeister/Collins (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Krista Stewart vs Marla Horvath / Lisa Mccorkle6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Gaye Holmes vs Celia Stallings / Lisa OBryan7-5, 6-2
2025-09-08vs SMyers (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Newman / Chantal Powers vs Joeline Ohlhaut / Kathryn Granger6-0, 6-3
2025-09-01vs SDickson (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Julie Derrico vs Gabriela ROY / Tamara Gallagher4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Sheri Newman vs Martha Lowman / Sally Dickson7-6, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Julie Derrico vs Jan Aspey / Kimberly French6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracy Reitz / Dori Cazorla vs Lisa Duggins / Jean Kreisher7-5, 6-1
2025-08-18vs CLetorney (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Sheri Newman vs Susan DeVore / Linda Hunley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGaye Holmes / Melodie Ohaus vs TAMMIE BRANDT / Bridget Megginson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-13vs BHoff/LWallace (Carmel)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDori Cazorla / Sheri Newman vs Mary White / Paige Reece6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Derrico / Melodie Ohaus vs Bethany Hoff / Mary Ruth Faulkner6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Chantal Powers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Julie Derrico
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Carlene Delorenzo
published 3.5
3.12
Jigisha Thaker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Susan Blackman
published
2.99
Dori Cazorla
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Gaye Holmes
published
2.96
Sheri Newman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Tracy Reitz
published
2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Margit Etzel
published
2.47
Nathalie Malter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melodie Ohaus + Sheri Newman11361% games+12.0% vs expected
Dori Cazorla + Julie Derrico51040% games−11.0% vs expected
Melodie Ohaus + Julie Derrico5455% gamesnot enough data
Dori Cazorla + Chantal Powers1635% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Newman + Chantal Powers3356% gamesnot enough data
Dori Cazorla + Sheri Newman123 matchesnot enough data
Gaye Holmes + Sheri Newman213 matchesnot enough data
Jigisha Thaker + Sheri Newman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chantal Powers
29W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Julie Derrico
86W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Carlene Delorenzo
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jigisha Thaker
64W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Susan Blackman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Dori Cazorla
79W–92L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Gaye Holmes
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Sheri Newman
71W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Tracy Reitz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Margit Etzel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Nathalie Malter
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.