Teams

MAC-Ramser

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-26vs SAL-NewmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesKim Boys / Melody Morton vs Mandy Tornabene / Jeff Hartman6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesJames Temple / Tanisha Moseley vs Jeffrey Blasko / Kim Martin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-05vs ACAC-WilsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Church / William Reid vs Robbin Coleman / Brian Adams1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-02-27vs CCV-AveryLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Carter / Melody Morton vs Preston Dillard / Kristin Mullins3-6, 1-6
2022-02-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelody Morton / Scott Terrell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-04vs WO-BlackwoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Reid / Mary Church vs Agustin Rodriguez / Yancey Haas2-6, 1-6
2022-01-29vs BURK-ClarkLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelody Morton / James Temple vs Travis Prowant / Virginia Bowie5-7, 2-6
2022-01-22vs WW-ConnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Temple / Tanisha Moseley vs Sean DiBlasi / Jessica van Tuyle1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKim Boys / Melody Morton vs James Mullahy / Heather Harker1-6, 4-6
2022-01-09vs HERM-HardestySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Temple / Tanisha Moseley vs Krysten Bishop / Jon Nystrom3-6, 2-4
W#3 DoublesMelody Morton / Kim Boys vs Susan Mangin / Andy Haug6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Tanisha Moseley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.32
Mary Church
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Melody Morton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.03
Chad Wolff
published 3
2.85
Anne Wolff
published 3
2.81
Kim Boys
published
Donna Moore
published 3
2.32
James Temple
published 3
Scott Terrell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanisha Moseley
154W–148L career · 14 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
Mary Church
176W–130L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Melody Morton
57W–58L career · 6 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Chad Wolff
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Anne Wolff
23W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.81
3
Donna Moore
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
James Temple
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32
Scott Terrell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.