Teams

MSIL/Doscotch/55&Over7.0W

2025 Adult 55 & Over - West League · West MSIL A55 & Over 7.0W

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesRebecca Vanmeter / Amy Armstrong vs Clair Kaye / Diane Pelafos4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-29vs MSIL A55&O 7.0W Henderson-ChampaignSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLucinda Uphoff / Jennifer Hawkins vs Dorothy Deschler / Vickie Murphy6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Bennett / Shawn Doscotch vs Kaye Kimpling / Susan Novitsky7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-22vs MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-BloomingtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Vanmeter / Elaine Hardy vs Lynda Hruska / Karen Owen5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Madix / Jennifer Hawkins vs Lori Rebholz / Nancy Lamb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-15vs MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-PekinWon 30
W#1 DoublesLucinda Uphoff / Jennifer Hawkins vs Susan Davis / Letitia Spirek-Algrain6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShawn Doscotch / Shen Dirkes vs Roberta Kendzierski / Jan Harrison6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaribeth Dura / Carolyn Boblitt vs Kris Wertz / Soonok Cramer6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesRebecca Vanmeter / Amy Armstrong vs Lori Rebholz / Jan Dickerson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaribeth Dura / Shawn Doscotch vs Chris Knight / Nancy Lamb7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-24vs MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-PekinWon 20
W#1 DoublesLucinda Uphoff / Jennifer Hawkins vs Roberta Kendzierski / Sue Chelikas6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Boblitt / Shawn Doscotch vs Susan Davis / Letitia Spirek-Algrain2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hawkins / Stephanie Madix vs Leslie Neitzel / Renee Brown5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Vanmeter / Elaine Hardy vs Susan Novitsky / Kaye Kimpling7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMaribeth Dura / Carolyn Boblitt vs Glenda Henderson / Sharon Jackson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-07-10vs MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-BloomingtonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShawn Doscotch / Carolyn Boblitt vs Lynda Hruska / Jan Dickerson0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Bennett / Shen Dirkes vs Sally Mangina / Patty Tobiasz6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-27vs MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-PekinWon 20
W#2 DoublesShawn Doscotch / Carolyn Boblitt vs Susan Davis / Patricia Wombacher6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hawkins / Michelle Minor vs Janice Zagardo / Jan Harrison4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · West MSIL A55 & Over 7.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL/Doscotch/55&Over7.0W7218925224
2MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-Bloomington45151230246
3MSIL A55&O 7.0W Henderson-Champaign45121535279
4MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin3691839278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Stephanie Madix
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Rebecca Vanmeter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Lucinda Uphoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Maribeth Dura
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.38
Shawn Doscotch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.33
Michelle Minor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Elaine Hardy
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.92
Amy Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Carolyn Boblitt
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jennifer Hawkins
published
Jodi Scott
published
Shen Dirkes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Doscotch + Maribeth Dura4250% games−2.5% vs expected
Shawn Doscotch + Carolyn Boblitt6257% gamesnot enough data
Maribeth Dura + Lucinda Uphoff314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Armstrong + Rebecca Vanmeter134 matchesnot enough data
Maribeth Dura + Carolyn Boblitt303 matchesnot enough data
Lucinda Uphoff + Carolyn Boblitt303 matchesnot enough data
Lucinda Uphoff + Rebecca Vanmeter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Madix
83W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Rebecca Vanmeter
66W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Lucinda Uphoff
213W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Maribeth Dura
104W–77L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Shawn Doscotch
42W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Michelle Minor
19W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Elaine Hardy
99W–68L career · 8 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Amy Armstrong
87W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Carolyn Boblitt
83W–35L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Jennifer Hawkins
47W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jodi Scott
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shen Dirkes
52W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.