Teams

Mixed Lucky Strings-Caliri

2024 Fredericksburg Tri-Level Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Tri-Level Mixed 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie Caliri / Maurice Cornejo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-02vs YMCA TNT-DorotaLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Sereno / Matt Jackson vs Amanda Kilfoil / Curtis Harris6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-09-11vs YMCA TNT-DorotaLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Sereno / Trent Billups vs Brita Robinson / Curtis Harris0-6, 2-6
2024-09-08vs Fawn Lake Smart Aces-PenningsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie Caliri / Michael Brown vs Theodore Marcus / Nikki Hyldahl6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-07vs YMCA TNT-DorotaLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarla Aste / Pat Gillespie vs Liz Walsh / Joseph Yoshimura4-6, 2-6
2024-09-04vs YMCA TNT-DorotaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEmily Sereno / Trent Billups vs Dorota Sipko / Luis Aragon3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarla Aste / Pat Gillespie vs Liz Walsh / Carlo Gonzales6-4, 6-4
2024-08-28vs YMCA TNT-DorotaLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Sereno / David Hyman vs Dorota Sipko / Luis Aragon3-6, 5-7
2024-08-24vs YMCA TNT-DorotaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEmily Sereno / Matt Jackson vs Amanda Kilfoil / Curtis Harris6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeslie Caliri / Dusten Rees vs Catherine Stokes / Joseph Yoshimura7-6, 3-4
2024-08-17vs YMCA TNT-DorotaLost 02
L#2 DoublesEmily Sereno / David Hyman vs Catherine Stokes / Bill Thomas2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLeslie Caliri / Pat Gillespie vs Liz Walsh / Joseph Yoshimura3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Tri-Level Mixed 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Bobbi Shoop
published 4
3.53
Marla Aste
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Emily Sereno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Leslie Caliri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Lorrie Roberts
published
Dusten Rees
published 3.5
Karna Hyman
published
Pat Gillespie
published
Ralph Agpaoa
published
Trent Billups
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bobbi Shoop
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Marla Aste
83W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Emily Sereno
42W–24L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Leslie Caliri
51W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Lorrie Roberts
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dusten Rees
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karna Hyman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pat Gillespie
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ralph Agpaoa
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trent Billups
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.