Teams

Saw Mill Club

2021 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-04-10vs WTC FireballsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathleen Gilston / Misun Kim vs Marlena Simmons / Judy Bloom4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Ros / Alexis Stern vs Camela Morrissey / Barbara Gallois2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-03-21vs WTC: Triple CrownSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKathleen Gilston / Amy Lerner vs Michelle Ryan / Jenifer Kelley6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Dimaano / Alexis Stern vs Patricia Jones / Megan Brausa0-6, 4-6
2021-03-14vs Sportime Harbor IslandWon 30
W#1 DoublesOksana Mikhailova / Ethylene Ziegler vs Jennifer Murphy / Yvonne Iversen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Gilston / Misun Kim vs Sally Cantwell / Satoko Tanimoto6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Cambareri / Julie Ros vs Elizabeth Bernstein / Tanya Meyers7-5, 6-1
2021-03-07vs Club Fit BriarcliffSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmy Lerner / Robyn Cartularo vs Paula Park / Kathy Goltzman6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlexis Stern / Christine Dimaano vs Patricia Butter / Susan Halper3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-02-21vs WTC: FireballsWon 20
W#2 DoublesMisun Kim / Kathleen Gilston vs Marlena Simmons / Nancy Ossenfort6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJessica Cambareri / Alexis Stern vs Camela Morrissey / Laura Cramer6-3, 6-0
2021-02-07vs CRRC: The BobcatsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmy Lerner / KENDLE ARCIDIACONO vs Sarah Cion / Cindy Greenstein6-1, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Cambareri / Christine Dimaano vs Jessica Bremer / Robin Schultz2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-01-24vs Southern: Yonkers Tennis CenterLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy Lerner / Kathleen Gilston vs Stephanie O'Sullivan / Stella Yi-Burke2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Suett / Julie Ros vs Kathleen DiSalvatore / Leana Rahman4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Lori Calat
published 4.5
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Misun Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Ellen Finn
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.54
Amy Lerner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
KENDLE ARCIDIACONO
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Jessica Cambareri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Robyn Cartularo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Kathleen Gilston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Alexis Stern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Christine Dimaano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julie Ros
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Suett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sylvia Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Cartularo + Amy Lerner12559% games+2.6% vs expected
Kathleen Gilston + Misun Kim7456% games+2.3% vs expected
KENDLE ARCIDIACONO + Amy Lerner1275257% games+1.1% vs expected
Robyn Cartularo + Jessica Cambareri9655% games+0.2% vs expected
Kathleen Gilston + Amy Lerner4747% games−1.5% vs expected
KENDLE ARCIDIACONO + Robyn Cartularo134 matchesnot enough data
KENDLE ARCIDIACONO + Misun Kim404 matchesnot enough data
Julie Ros + Alexis Stern314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lori Calat
166W–91L career · type A · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Ethylene Ziegler
87W–63L career · 1 line in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Misun Kim
80W–69L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Ellen Finn
60W–76L career · 8 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Amy Lerner
253W–130L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
3.54
KENDLE ARCIDIACONO
173W–75L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
Jessica Cambareri
49W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
Robyn Cartularo
82W–73L career · 1 line in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Kathleen Gilston
84W–145L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Alexis Stern
41W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Christine Dimaano
50W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Julie Ros
49W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Suett
37W–59L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Sylvia Herzog
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.