Teams

CLetorney/GLiz (Mason Wallace)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-08vs NDenton (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMeagan Maddox / Bridget Megginson vs Jennifer Lang / Debra Holland3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-17vs KBattle/JWalker (Sardis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Wager / Amanda Kupchella vs Emily Bass / Meredith Heimburger0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Galvin / Bridget Megginson vs Kimberly Battle / Mollie Allen2-6, 1-6
2025-09-12vs KMosby (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarrie Letorney / Gabriela Liz vs Lacey Wolski / Alli Tate4-6, 3-6
2025-09-05vs APessina (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBridget Megginson / Margaret Janovsky vs Brittany Russell / Kristin Thompson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGabriela Liz / Juliana Comeau vs Sara Porrata / Lara Aboulhosn2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Kupchella / Meagan Maddox vs Laura Satterly / Isabelle Mcleod3-6, 5-7
2025-09-03vs JKarasek/MFrancis (Carmel)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBridget Megginson / Juliana Comeau vs Ginny Starnes / Stephanie Parker2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGabriela Liz / Debby Bosselman vs Jessica Shannon / Sara Delaney7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmanda Kupchella / Margaret Janovsky vs Kelli Narveson / Emily Hodge2-6, 3-6
2025-08-29vs ASpanjers/TRicks (Mason Wallace)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmanda Kupchella / Debby Bosselman vs Alyse Fuller / Jennifer Teller2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Bridget Megginson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Debby Bosselman
published 3
2.68
Juliana Comeau
published
2.65
Gabriela Liz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.60
Jodi Warner
published
2.50
Meagan Maddox
published
2.48
Carrie Letorney
published 3
2.38
Amanda Kupchella
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.37
Suzanne Galvin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Hollie Collins-Dean
published
2.16
Nicole Wager
published
Margaret Janovsky
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bridget Megginson
23W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Debby Bosselman
18W–46L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Juliana Comeau
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Gabriela Liz
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.65
Jodi Warner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Meagan Maddox
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
3
Carrie Letorney
15W–29L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amanda Kupchella
24W–27L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Suzanne Galvin
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Hollie Collins-Dean
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
Nicole Wager
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.16
Margaret Janovsky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.