Teams

Kirsch, Scott

2022 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs HOA/Stroede/40&Over4.0MSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKris Chatrathi / Scott Kirsch vs Brian Burton / Ravi Peru1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Jones / Michael Shinn vs Travis Heintzelman / John Stroede2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-16vs Holsinger, TrevorLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmmett Logan / Henry Arst vs Mark Fendler / Doug Schwabauer3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesScott Kirsch vs Malcolm Atherton6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDave Walterscheid / Norman Friedman vs Kevin Boehringer / Shawn Perkins2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Curley / Michael Shinn vs Kenneth Havens / Timothy Buller2-6, 4-6
2022-04-09vs HOA/Stroede/40&Over4.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesNorman Friedman / Joseph Ubalde vs Brian Burton / Derrick Field3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Shinn / Daniel Curley vs Mitchell Bennett / Anthony Seim3-6, 4-6
2022-04-02vs Thyagarajan, JagannathLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristopher Jones / Henry Arst vs Chris Freeman / Russ Everhart1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesScott Phillips vs John Stolte6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKris Chatrathi / Joseph Ubalde vs Ram Shankar / Eric Goforth1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDave Walterscheid / Norman Friedman vs Guillermo Ospino / Scott Steinmetz3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-03-26vs Benschoter, GibLost 04
L#1 DoublesNorman Friedman / Scott Phillips vs Jeffrey Spivak / Kirk Blinzler3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesScott Kirsch vs Jeff Taylor3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Curley / Christopher Jones vs Jim Weaver / Bryan Paris6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Shinn / Dave Walterscheid vs Stan Chappell / Lonnie Clemon2-6, 4-6
2022-03-05vs Reedy, MarkWon 21
L#1 DoublesHenry Arst / Emmett Logan vs Robert Jacobs / William Zung2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Phillips / Norman Friedman vs Jeff Kirkpatrick / Adam Ritchie4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Curley / Michael Shinn vs Benjamin Nathan / Mark Reedy6-1, 7-5
2022-02-26vs Smith, JohnLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristopher Jones / Norman Friedman vs Dafang Zhang / Gadi Bramson4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesScott Kirsch vs Jason Bonet7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJames Dawkins / Emmett Logan vs Jeffrey Marcott / Steve Baker2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHenry Arst / Michael Shinn vs Stuart Carrico / Qasim Pervaiz0-6, 1-6
2022-02-12vs Urban, RickLost 12
L#1 DoublesNorman Friedman / Kris Chatrathi vs Dennis Cruise / Scott Bollinger6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesScott Kirsch / Daniel Curley vs Greg Oborny / BANGALORE DEEPAK6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDave Walterscheid / James Dawkins vs Scott Siemers / Abiodun Akinwuntan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Curley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Dave Walterscheid
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Scott Kirsch
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Emmett Logan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Henry Arst
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Kris Chatrathi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Norman Friedman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.47
James Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.19
Michael Shinn
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Joseph Ubalde
published
Scott Phillips
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norman Friedman + Emmett Logan6254% games+3.5% vs expected
Norman Friedman + James Dawkins5649% games+2.6% vs expected
Kris Chatrathi + Norman Friedman4749% games−1.0% vs expected
Scott Phillips + Norman Friedman2350% gamesnot enough data
Norman Friedman + Henry Arst1443% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Curley + Scott Kirsch224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Ubalde + Norman Friedman224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Ubalde + James Dawkins404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Curley
22W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dave Walterscheid
26W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Kirsch
59W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Emmett Logan
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Henry Arst
19W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kris Chatrathi
25W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
Norman Friedman
71W–78L career · 7 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
James Dawkins
25W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
Michael Shinn
37W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Joseph Ubalde
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Phillips
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.