Teams

LTA-Q GREEN

2023 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs NJ BLACKLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesPaige Sopcic vs Pam Long2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-13vs BP REDWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesEmily Pieper / Aubrey Woodard vs Everett Johnson / Julie Willson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesPaige Sopcic vs Karleigh Kimble6-4, 6-3
2023-07-11vs TTA-E BLUEWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesJulie Fletcher / Emily Pieper vs Sarah Vincent / Kelsa Morgan6-2, 6-1
2023-07-06vs PH GREENLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesJaclin Elkins / Aubrey Woodard vs Emma Katubig / Mauri Rapuzzi3-6, 0-6
2023-06-22vs CP ORANGEWon 21
L#1 Female DoublesJaclin Elkins / Julie Fletcher vs Katie Kennedy / Annie Rapson6-7, 1-6
W#1 Female SinglesAmita Pandey vs Carly Blum6-0, 6-0
W#2 Female SinglesEmily Pieper vs Cynthia Lopez7-5, 6-2
2023-06-15vs WP GREENSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesAubrey Woodard / Jaclin Elkins vs Audrey Hamilton / Kylie Sumpter4-6, 3-6
W#1 Female SinglesPaige Sopcic vs Megan Gunden6-0, 6-4
2023-06-08vs LEBTC BLUELost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAmita Pandey / Emily Pieper vs Vanessa Parsons / Lauren Austin4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Leah Powers
published
3.97
Amita Pandey
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 4
3.63
Paige Sopcic
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 4
3.40
Emily Pieper
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Jaclin Elkins
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Julie Fletcher
published
3.04
Aubrey Woodard
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Powers
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Amita Pandey
49W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.97
4
Paige Sopcic
82W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Emily Pieper
50W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Jaclin Elkins
63W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Julie Fletcher
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Aubrey Woodard
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.