Teams

Starr/AlamanceCC 18s 2.5W Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women 18 & Over Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs GVP 18s 2.5 Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmma Maggi / Lindsey Rowe vs Tammy Milani / Lisa Sullivan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Allen / Merritt Huffman vs Vanessa Haygood / Joanna Phillips6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHannah Zogzas / Cydney Bates vs Virginia Gaylor / Jenna Ahmad1-6, 1-6
2026-08-20vs Pinyan 18s 2.5W Combo Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsey Rowe / Margaret Reyes vs Paola Scilinguo-Mendoza / Allison Chisholm0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Weir / Emma Maggi vs Phyllis Lancaster / Tessa Olinger2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Boteler / Kasey Dampier vs Colleen Pinyan / Julia Jones1-6, 0-6
2026-08-06vs GVP 18s 2.5 Thurs PMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Parker / Emma Maggi vs Renee Hicks / Michelle Shubert6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Ellington / Christine Sellers vs Barbara Michael / Erica Harden2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & Over Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Emma Maggi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ashley Boteler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Christine Sellers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Christy Weir
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cydney Bates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Hannah Zogzas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kasey Dampier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Ellington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Reyes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Merritt Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Maggi
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Ashley Boteler
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Christine Sellers
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Christy Weir
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Cydney Bates
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Hannah Zogzas
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kasey Dampier
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Linda Ellington
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Rowe
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Reyes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Merritt Huffman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.