Teams

Be.Rubin55A

2026 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-30vs Ca.Werder55A3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesIndia Pleasants / Tracy Owens vs Peggy Dobbins / Cathy Werder1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTheresa Rosario-Jansen / Wanda Wilson vs Lori Larrabee / Dane Brackett6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Tina Parker vs Kimberlei Gill / Diane Adams6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-23vs Vi.Dagit55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesWanda Wilson / Ellen Osbourne vs Priscilla Nanney / Mary Strothmann7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Tina Parker vs Danielle Cardona / Randi Rosen4-6, 3-6
2026-04-16vs Te.Jones55ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Jill Koury vs Sally Wooten / Mary Bossong5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTheresa Rosario-Jansen / Tracy Owens vs Amy Baker / Beth Burrus4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-02vs Da.Rusnak55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Williams / Malinda Schantz vs Pamela Pitre / Kelly Huffstetler6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Jill Koury vs Juli Johnson / Jade Paunovich6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWanda Wilson / India Pleasants vs Angela Wood / Dawn Rusnak6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-26vs Ki.Roberts55AWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Theresa Rosario-Jansen vs Beverly Fedewa / Sally Willert5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Williams / Jorgelina Stroud vs Jeannine McClung / Jennifer Diehl6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Parker / Ellen Osbourne vs Susan Kirkman / Shannon Fuller6-2, 6-0
2026-03-20vs Ca.Zimmerman55ALost 12
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Ellen Osbourne vs Carol Vervaert / Kim Hopkins1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMalinda Schantz / Diane Williams vs Frederica Shipman / Cheryl Sweitzer6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTina Parker / Wanda Wilson vs Lucine Barker / Mayra Rodriguez4-6, 2-6
2026-03-19vs Ma.Springfield55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Theresa Rosario-Jansen vs Angela Hunter / Joanna Valler7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIndia Pleasants / Tina Parker vs Marcia Springfield / Sonja Scalia6-1, 6-4
2026-03-12vs Su.Bowers55AWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Jill Koury vs Annette Tavernaro / Sarah Glover2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Williams / Jorgelina Stroud vs Christine Panzl / Genny Igo6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWanda Wilson / Tina Parker vs Pam Weis / Shannon Parham6-3, 6-2
2026-03-05vs We.Sielaty55A3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Owens / Beverly Rubin vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Marie Gelston3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Rosario-Jansen / Phoebe Hill vs Sabrina Kane / Julie Liddle3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWanda Wilson / Malinda Schantz vs Audrey Hollett / Laurie Compiano7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1We.Sielaty55A3.09020719193
2Sh.Chapman55A8018614158
3Ca.Werder55A3.063171020194
4Vi.Dagit55A63151229252
5Da.Rusnak55A63141329242
6An.Redmond55A5315920186
7Ki.Lamb55A3.053121230236
8Be.Rubin55A54151229229
9Hop.Pflaum55A4415921194
10Te.Jones55A45161126244
11Ca.Zimmerman55A45151227223
12Su.Bowers55A45141332247
13Be.Robertson55A35111329214
14Mo.Garrell55A35111330234
15Ki.Roberts55A1852247302
16El.Zimmerman55A0822244288
17Ma.Springfield55A0942349303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Tracy Owens
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Ellen Osbourne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Malinda Schantz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Jill Koury
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Theresa Rosario-Jansen
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.74
India Pleasants
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Beverly Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Wanda Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.64
Jorgelina Stroud
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
Phoebe Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Koury + Beverly Rubin213 matchesnot enough data
India Pleasants + Wanda Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Rosario-Jansen + Beverly Rubin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Owens
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Ellen Osbourne
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Malinda Schantz
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jill Koury
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Theresa Rosario-Jansen
9W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
India Pleasants
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Beverly Rubin
85W–106L career · 12 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Wanda Wilson
10W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Jorgelina Stroud
121W–177L career · 11 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.