Teams

HemaniCarswell/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-09vs Niethammer/Buckner/ChesneyLost 14
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Carswell / Michelle Russ vs Amanda Niethammer / Jessie Hall1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesShireen Hemani vs Kendal Fitzsimmons4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly LeRoy / Caroline Ervin vs Faith Chesney / Mimi Rust1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Mandi McCrary3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDarcy Hoffman / Lisha Venable vs Meredith Buckner / Younsun Choi1-6, 3-6
2025-05-02vs Bailey/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesAdriana Shimeall / Darcy Hoffman vs Jenny McGlothin / Lake Bailey1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Russ / Haley Seivers vs Alyssa Weagley / Callie Jubran2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Emily Bynum0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisha Venable / Monica Sarrat vs Gina Hovis / Leslie Lischer0-6, 0-6
2025-04-04vs Niethammer/Buckner/ChesneyLost 05
L#1 DoublesManisha Patel / Michelle Russ vs Meredith Buckner / Mimi Rust1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesShireen Hemani vs Amanda Niethammer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisha Venable / Sarah Dolan vs Madison Coleman / Colbey Keele1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Jessie Hall0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Sarrat / Janet Nichols vs Faith Chesney / Grace Loope6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-28vs Bailey/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Carswell / Monica Sarrat vs Jenny Hall / Jenny McGlothin5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Lake Bailey0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisha Venable / Haley Seivers vs Meka Barry / Gina Hovis0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesShireen Hemani vs Shannon Swafford1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly LeRoy / Caroline Ervin vs Callie Jubran / Brittany Dilworth0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Suzanne Carswell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Michelle Russ
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Sue Mather
published
2.58
Shireen Hemani
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Caroline Ervin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.51
Darcy Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.38
Janet Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Kimberly LeRoy
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
2.36
Monica Sarrat
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.36
Lisha Venable
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Adriana Shimeall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.96
Cindy Holt
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
1.87
Leigh Gatto
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Haley Seivers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Dolan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Russ + Suzanne Carswell4454% games+5.8% vs expected
Janet Nichols + Caroline Ervin8853% games−1.9% vs expected
Cindy Holt + Leigh Gatto0623% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Russ + Darcy Hoffman2446% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly LeRoy + Monica Sarrat2342% gamesnot enough data
Monica Sarrat + Janet Nichols224 matchesnot enough data
Lisha Venable + Darcy Hoffman033 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Holt + Darcy Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Carswell
27W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Michelle Russ
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Sue Mather
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Shireen Hemani
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Caroline Ervin
10W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
3
Darcy Hoffman
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Janet Nichols
12W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Kimberly LeRoy
11W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Monica Sarrat
11W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Lisha Venable
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
Adriana Shimeall
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Cindy Holt
3W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Leigh Gatto
3W–36L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Haley Seivers
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miryana Eichelberger
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Dolan
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.