Teams

Williamson/Wilson

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-02vs McKenna/Doerr DAYWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudi Leseur / Helen Cressy vs Holly Yoo / Laurie Buckelew Burt6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Fania / Susan Wilson vs Janet Harbeck / Cindy Antonelli6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarrie Guerrette / Rachael Bondy vs Anne Ryals / Laura Bowen6-0, 7-6
2026-08-31vs Davidson 7.5 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Fania / Helen Cressy vs Jeanne Gillen / Linda Wilson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Keipper / Rachael Bondy vs Sarah McKenzie / Patti Kucan6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJudi Leseur / Susan Wilson vs Lori Haskins / Anna Martin3-6, 6-7
2026-08-24vs CAMPBELLLost 12
W#1 DoublesPeggy O'Connell / Rachael Bondy vs Jenna Butler / Lynn Gore5-7, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Wilson / Karen Fania vs Melissa Straub / Kris Summers3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLori Keipper / Kelli Brownfield vs Julie Cooke / Kelly Ochsner2-6, 2-6
2026-08-19vs Best/ConleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Keipper / Rachael Bondy vs Adair Wright / Jan Best6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeth OConnor / Sabrina Nikel vs Kellie Keehn / Barbara Conley7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelli Brownfield / Catherine Richard vs Wendy McElhinney / Donna Petrilla6-3, 6-3
2026-08-14vs Messier Coco DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Fania / Helen Cressy vs Jean Robbins / Debra Carbone6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Keipper / Rachael Bondy vs Margaret Coco / Phyllis Sheets6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudi Leseur / Susan Wilson vs Kathleen Hawkins / Katie Monroe6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Peggy O'Connell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Judi Leseur
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Catherine Richard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Beth OConnor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Lori Keipper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Helen Cressy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Kelli Brownfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Carrie Guerrette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Rachael Bondy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Cheryl Matsche
published 3.5
Joan Proctor
published
Karen Fania
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sabrina Nikel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Brownfield + Carrie Guerrette11459% games+5.3% vs expected
Lori Keipper + Beth OConnor2541% games−8.5% vs expected
Joan Proctor + Peggy O'Connell5453% games−9.5% vs expected
Cheryl Matsche + Lori Keipper134 matchesnot enough data
Lori Keipper + Peggy O'Connell224 matchesnot enough data
Lori Keipper + Rachael Bondy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy O'Connell
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Judi Leseur
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Catherine Richard
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Beth OConnor
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Lori Keipper
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Helen Cressy
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kelli Brownfield
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Carrie Guerrette
23W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Rachael Bondy
17W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Matsche
10W–13L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Joan Proctor
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Fania
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sabrina Nikel
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.