Teams

Pryzwansky/Loseke 55+ 3.5 Mixed Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 55 · 3.5 Mxd Mon PM

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-21vs Gilman 55+ 3.5 Mixed Mon PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Hestenes / Gilbert Andia vs Jeffery Ward / Jill Elam6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Loseke / Russell Loseke vs Doug Heberle / Lara Heberle5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesBeth Loseke / Russell Loseke vs Tiffany Weeks / Kevin Blackman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Ingle / Jeff Ingle vs Eleanor Redding / William Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Pryzwansky / Scott Pryzwansky vs Yvonne McConachie / Michael Bellas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-30vs Hughes 55+ 3.5 Mixed Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenton Kreager / Page Kreager vs Scott Bush / Toni Lewis5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGilbert Andia / Suzanne Andia vs Michael Vuncannon / Nancy McNeill2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRussell Loseke / Beth Loseke vs Robert Holt / Lynn Tester1-6, 1-6
2025-05-22vs Hilliard 55+ 3.5 Mixed Mon PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Andia / Gilbert Andia vs Betty Haggard / Rob Leggett6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPage Kreager / Kenton Kreager vs Garland Hilliard / Monica Medina-Murphy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Ingle / Jeff Ingle vs David Rachels / Lisa Hilliard0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mxd Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Ann Zuraw
published 3.5
3.31
Linda Hestenes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kenton Kreager
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Benjamin Zuraw
published 3.5
3.20
Beth Loseke
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Gilbert Andia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Page Kreager
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Jeff Ingle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Alex Partagas
published 3
2.92
Suzanne Andia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Wendy Ingle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Lori Partagas
published
Kelly Pryzwansky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Russell Loseke
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Pryzwansky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Ingle + Jeff Ingle2537% games−10.4% vs expected
Page Kreager + Kenton Kreager1538% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Andia + Gilbert Andia2346% gamesnot enough data
Beth Loseke + Russell Loseke134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Zuraw
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Kenton Kreager
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Benjamin Zuraw
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Beth Loseke
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Gilbert Andia
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Page Kreager
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
Jeff Ingle
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Alex Partagas
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
Suzanne Andia
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Wendy Ingle
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Lori Partagas
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Russell Loseke
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Pryzwansky
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.