Teams

Wharton Low

2021 · 2022 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2022 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Ellen Thomas
published 4.5
3.89
Sally Velasquez
published
3.75
Patsy Bendall
published
Abbey Sims
published 4
3.59
Marian Wharton
published
3.56
Michelle Lisenby
published
3.44
Julie Reynolds
published
3.42
Catherine Harless
published 3.5
3.30
Eima Sims
published 3.5
3.23
Jenelle Floyd
published
3.21
Charlie Arnold
published 3.5
Jan Foshee
published
Rebecca Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Harless + Julie Reynolds3253% games−0.8% vs expected
Patsy Bendall + Julie Reynolds41245% games−1.8% vs expected
Julie Reynolds + Marian Wharton3354% gamesnot enough data
Patsy Bendall + Marian Wharton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ellen Thomas
49W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Sally Velasquez
34W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Patsy Bendall
39W–50L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Abbey Sims
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marian Wharton
37W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.59
Michelle Lisenby
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.56
Julie Reynolds
25W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Catherine Harless
21W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Eima Sims
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
Jenelle Floyd
18W–22L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Charlie Arnold
31W–26L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Jan Foshee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Brooks
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.