Teams

Indy A18 3.5M CRC Koval

Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CITA Indy 18 & Over 3.5 Men, W

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-05vs Indy A18 3.5M PATC WalpoleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuis Santana / Vitaliy Koval vs Tyler McDonald / Peter Walpole6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClaudio Troncoso vs Martin Venarotti6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesYuta Fukushima / ABHIJIT DAS vs Damian Rosales / Chris Parker6-1, 6-1
2026-02-26vs Indy A18 3.5M WIRC DavisWon 30
W#1 DoublesLuis Santana / Andy Giesler vs Scott Bushey / Tyson Smith6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesABHIJIT DAS vs David Wright6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCurtis Costlow / Claudio Troncoso vs Kurt White / Brent Stiers6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-19vs Indy A18 3.5M IRCD PuckettWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Zacarias / Yuta Fukushima vs Tom Anderson / Steven Walsmith6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesVitaliy Koval vs Declan Mast4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Giesler / Luis Santana vs Chris Ficklin / Nick Hupp6-3, 6-1
2026-02-12vs Indy A18 3.5M IHP DewesWon 21
L#1 DoublesMatt Zacarias / Michael Chevalier vs Aakif Rangoonwala / John Keenan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesABHIJIT DAS vs Swaran Subbaiah5-7, 5-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVitaliy Koval / Curtis Costlow vs Eric Cervantes / Matt Sifferlen6-2, 7-6
2026-01-29vs Indy A18 3.5M IRCD SinghLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Chevalier / ABHIJIT DAS vs Michael Taylor / Joshua McShane5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesVitaliy Koval vs Damon Grothe4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDave DeCraene / Yuta Fukushima vs SC Bocade / Michael Linnen2-6, 1-6
2026-01-22vs Indy A18 3.5M IRCD ZacherSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCurtis Costlow / Vitaliy Koval vs Kevin Dedrick / Thomas Dempsey1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Zacarias / ABHIJIT DAS vs Chris Uselmann / Josh Villafuerte6-2, 6-2
2026-01-15vs Indy A18 3.5M IRCD PhillipsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatt Zacarias / ABHIJIT DAS vs Anthony Annee / Thomas Hurley7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVitaliy Koval / Andy Giesler vs Robert Johnson / BRYAN JACKSON6-4, 6-1
2026-01-08vs Indy A18 3.5M IRCD JacksonWon 20
W#1 DoublesFrank Perconte / Claudio Troncoso vs Christopher Kinsey / Mitchell Kinsey7-5, 5-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Chevalier / Curtis Costlow vs Thu Han Aung / Ronald Ruff6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · CITA Indy 18 & Over 3.5 Men, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh8021310145
2Indy A18 3.5M PATC Walpole6217716155
3Indy A18 3.5M CRC Koval6217719191
4Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Zacher43111023196
5Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Phillips4491533242
6Indy A18 3.5M IHP Dewes35121227225
7Indy A18 3.5M WIRC Davis2681635250
8Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Puckett2671738261
9Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Jackson0731837236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Vitaliy Koval
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
ABHIJIT DAS
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Matt Zacarias
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Michael Chevalier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Yuta Fukushima
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Claudio Troncoso
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Andy Giesler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Curtis Costlow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Luis Santana
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Chevalier + Matt Zacarias3547% games+1.1% vs expected
ABHIJIT DAS + Matt Zacarias4255% gamesnot enough data
ABHIJIT DAS + Yuta Fukushima3256% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Costlow + Michael Chevalier314 matchesnot enough data
Curtis Costlow + Vitaliy Koval213 matchesnot enough data
Curtis Costlow + Claudio Troncoso213 matchesnot enough data
Matt Zacarias + Vitaliy Koval213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vitaliy Koval
56W–44L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
ABHIJIT DAS
45W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Matt Zacarias
47W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Michael Chevalier
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Yuta Fukushima
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Claudio Troncoso
11W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Andy Giesler
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Curtis Costlow
57W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Luis Santana
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.