Teams

CSRC MCPHERSON

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-24vs PBTC TUCKERLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori McPherson / Sara Berry vs Rochelle Beier-Kemmet / Linda Sanchez4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Kady Hommel vs Paula Henson / Brenda Findley7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVikki ONeil / Jeannie Roeber vs Julie Larson / Leah Ann Tucker0-6, 3-6
2022-06-17vs CCOC LEVISLost 12
W#1 DoublesRoni Schlagel / Nancy Siegel vs Jinna Ziegler / Laura Kolivoski6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Kady Hommel vs Cheryl Gorthy / Angela Sullivan4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Sara Berry vs Noni Peterson / Henrietta Levis2-6, 1-6
2022-06-10vs LTFCS RYALSLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori McPherson / Susan Wilklow vs Annette Markert / Debra Orton1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKady Hommel / Amy Laird vs Sara Michon / Laura Schafer4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-07vs PBTC TUCKERWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Siegel / Roni Schlagel vs Rochelle Beier-Kemmet / Julie Larson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Amy Laird vs Paula Henson / Rebecca VanBuskirk7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVikki ONeil / Jeannie Roeber vs Helen Arnold / Linda Sanchez7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-20vs CCOC LEVISWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Strack / Kady Hommel vs Laura Kolivoski / Noni Peterson7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Siegel / Roni Schlagel vs Maura Houston / Henrietta Levis7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLori McPherson / Amy Laird vs Cheryl Gorthy / Angela Sullivan4-6, 4-6
2022-05-13vs LTFCS RYALSLost 12
W#1 DoublesKady Hommel / Amy Laird vs Charlie Bishop / Jane Wisner6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeannie Roeber / Holly Strack vs Susan Moore / Laura Schafer1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSara Berry / Susan Wilklow vs Sara Michon / Anne Ryals3-6, 5-7
2022-05-06vs PBTC TUCKERWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Laird / Kady Hommel vs Julie Larson / Rochelle Beier-Kemmet6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoni Schlagel / Lori McPherson vs Paula Henson / Martina Lang6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Holly Strack vs Judy Mitchell / Helen Arnold6-2, 6-1
2022-04-29vs CCOC LEVISWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Lynn Mulder vs Jackie Jones / Jinna Ziegler6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKady Hommel / Amy Laird vs Laura Kolivoski / Noni Peterson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori McPherson / Vikki ONeil vs Cheryl Gorthy / Angela Sullivan4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Laird
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Holly Strack
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Kady Hommel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Nancy Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Carolayne Henry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.44
Susan Wilklow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Lori McPherson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jeannie Roeber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynn Mulder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roni Schlagel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sara Berry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Vikki ONeil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roni Schlagel + Nancy Siegel281058% games+5.0% vs expected
Lori McPherson + Kady Hommel4545% games+0.4% vs expected
Jeannie Roeber + Vikki ONeil3247% games−1.5% vs expected
Amy Laird + Kady Hommel8849% games−1.7% vs expected
Carolayne Henry + Kady Hommel3354% games−4.4% vs expected
Amy Laird + Lori McPherson134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Laird + Carolayne Henry134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Siegel + Kady Hommel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Laird
38W–55L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Holly Strack
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kady Hommel
102W–88L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Nancy Siegel
83W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Carolayne Henry
122W–137L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Susan Wilklow
18W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Lori McPherson
25W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Jeannie Roeber
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Mulder
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Roni Schlagel
50W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Berry
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vikki ONeil
21W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.