Teams

Wilfong 8.5 Combo 40s Fri AM

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-06vs Wink 8.5 Combo 40s Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Tara Burgio vs Amy Devaney / Jane Davenport6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Register / Bee Baker vs Deborah Nahser / Moira Dailey6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Crews / Lynn Guglielmo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-29vs Mays 8.5 Combo 40s Fri AMWon 20
W#2 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Chris Schermerhorn vs Whitney Ellis / Jennifer Mays5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlison Crews / Cari Powell vs Felicia Price / Sherman Covington6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesTara Burgio / Alison Crews vs Michele Alvarino / Michelle Porter6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Chris Schermerhorn vs Jill Moore / Kelly McKinley7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-15vs Wink 8.5 Combo 40s Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Bee Baker vs Moira Dailey / Leanne Dennis6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlison Crews / Cari Powell vs Jean Schmid / Deborah Nahser6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJody Fleming / Deborah Register vs Sue Wink / Skyler Bass6-0, 6-1
2023-09-08vs Mays 8.5 Combo 40s Fri AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Chris Schermerhorn vs Jennifer Mays / Deena Samuel7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlison Crews / Lynn Guglielmo vs Tracy Harlan / Jayne Johnston6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Priddy / Ginny Carpenter vs Kimberly Bell / Joann Hartzell0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAlison Crews / Cari Powell vs Bety Miranda / Beth Bell4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Tara Burgio vs Blair Churchill / Jill Moore4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJody Fleming / Ginny Carpenter vs Thanawan Hahn / Holly Parr5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Tara Burgio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlison Crews / Cari Powell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-11vs Mays 8.5 Combo 40s Fri AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Wilfong / Ginny Carpenter vs Jennifer Smith / Felicia Price3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Guglielmo / Alison Crews vs Jayne Johnston / Whitney Ellis6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Chris Schermerhorn vs Catherine Tanner / Kimberly Bell6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesLynn Guglielmo / Alison Crews vs Michele Alvarino / Sara Strasser4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJody Fleming / Deborah Register vs Sue Haddon / Kelly Parr1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Wilfong / Ginny Carpenter vs Sue English / Jill Moore6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Alison Crews
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Cari Powell
published 4
3.81
Deborah Register
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Jody Fleming
published
3.77
Ginny Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Tara Burgio
published
Bee Baker
published 4
3.73
Kimberley Lesage
published
3.71
Cathy Soblesky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.70
Lynn Guglielmo
published
3.68
Chris Schermerhorn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Kim Priddy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Crews + Lynn Guglielmo9457% games+1.1% vs expected
Deborah Register + Cathy Soblesky14660% games−0.0% vs expected
Deborah Register + Ginny Carpenter25567% gamesnot enough data
Chris Schermerhorn + Cathy Soblesky4155% gamesnot enough data
Alison Crews + Cathy Soblesky224 matchesnot enough data
Chris Schermerhorn + Ginny Carpenter224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Register + Kimberley Lesage404 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Soblesky + Ginny Carpenter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alison Crews
113W–61L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Cari Powell
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Deborah Register
208W–106L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Jody Fleming
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ginny Carpenter
107W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Tara Burgio
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Bee Baker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberley Lesage
9W–0L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cathy Soblesky
103W–71L career · 8 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
Lynn Guglielmo
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Chris Schermerhorn
83W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Kim Priddy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.