Teams

Lacy/Memphis

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs Lockard/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLibbie Bouck / Jessica Lim vs Latasha Echols / Gloria Hicks6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCourtney Perrin / Jessica Mar vs Veronica Anthony / Sophia Garrison6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKelly Crowe / Elza McKenna vs Agatha Asemota / Cheryl Body6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-08vs Musick/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrace Mckay Corkum / Libbie Bouck vs Catie Carter / Virginia Burbank1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnita Herren / Bradi Bair vs Courtney Woodmansee / Shanna Eason6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Northen-Lacy / Jo Picha vs Claire Sentilles / Katherine Sentilles6-7, 1-6
2025-07-01vs Lovell/MemphisLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Crowe / Salina Xu vs Malaney George / Leslie Walsh2-6, 3-6
2025-06-24vs Schneiderman/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Northen-Lacy / Elza McKenna vs Krista Tebbe / Constance Conley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Mar / Anita Herren vs Dana Stout / Jessica Flesch6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Lim / Grace Mckay Corkum vs Savannah Nagle / Tina Schneiderman1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-10vs Johnson/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLibbie Bouck / Courtney Perrin vs Sheila Carro / Whitney Hayes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Herren / Kelly Kuenzinger vs Mallory Walsh / Katie Morgan4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Crowe / Salina Xu vs Lauren Rogers / Teresa Sweeney6-4, 6-4
2025-06-03vs Bratton/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLibbie Bouck / Jessica Mar vs Christen Lundgren / Gabriella Yarbrough3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Herren / Susan Northen-Lacy vs Melony Bratton / Anne Higgins4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Crowe / Elza McKenna vs Taylor TerBurgh / Victoria Jackson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Anita Herren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Jessica Mar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Bradi Bair
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Gina Ramos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jo Picha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kelly Kuenzinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Susan Northen-Lacy
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.82
Kelly Crowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Salina Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Elza McKenna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jessica Lim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Libbie Bouck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalia Castellanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sydney Matsumoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradi Bair + Anita Herren251058% games+7.7% vs expected
Susan Northen-Lacy + Kelly Kuenzinger7549% games+3.2% vs expected
Susan Northen-Lacy + Bradi Bair15658% games+0.4% vs expected
Susan Northen-Lacy + Jo Picha123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anita Herren
92W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jessica Mar
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Bradi Bair
67W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Gina Ramos
32W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jo Picha
55W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Kelly Kuenzinger
38W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Susan Northen-Lacy
49W–54L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Kelly Crowe
29W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Salina Xu
25W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Elza McKenna
24W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
Jessica Lim
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Libbie Bouck
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalia Castellanos
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sydney Matsumoto
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.