Teams

7 Hermitage Williams

2024 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekday

19 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-30vs RICHMOND - WymanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristy Bauer / Kandace McGinnis vs Geri Samuels / Nicole Wyman3-6, 4-5
2024-08-23vs 5 MTC Patterson-JolinskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Crotty / AMY LINES vs Jeannie Langnau / Lindsay Hardage6-3, 6-2
2024-08-16vs 3 WOCC MoehlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Abbey Orski vs Gena Burr / Heather Drew6-3, 6-0
2024-08-15vs 8 ACAC Tandett JonesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristy Bauer / Mary Williams vs Kelly Naughton / Kristen Walton0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
AMY LINES
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Abbey Orski
published 4
3.82
Liz Charles
published
3.69
Kristy Bauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.53
Joanna Bergeron
published
3.50
Kandace McGinnis
published
3.49
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.40
Brittany Nichols
published 3.5
3.32
Rita Ryan
published
3.27
Andrea Broughton
published 3.5
Anshu Garcha
published 3.5
3.23
Sarah Martin
published
3.16
Samantha McLean
published
3.14
Kimberly Ross
published
2.83
Jennifer Leon
published
2.79
Elizabeth Betz
published
Jessica Tindel
published
Monica Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Stinson + Sarah Martin6265% games+11.9% vs expected
Beth Stinson + Joanna Bergeron303 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Crotty + Liz Charles213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
219W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Abbey Orski
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Liz Charles
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Kristy Bauer
57W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Joanna Bergeron
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kandace McGinnis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Beth Stinson
27W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Brittany Nichols
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
Rita Ryan
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andrea Broughton
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Anshu Garcha
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Martin
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Samantha McLean
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Kimberly Ross
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Jennifer Leon
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Elizabeth Betz
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Jessica Tindel
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Walsh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.