Teams

MARIN TC 65AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 65&Over · Men 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-04vs NorCal/Rasmussen/65&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesTom Schmierer / David Shepard vs Jeff Fong / Carter Njus2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRob Cochran / Stuart Lum vs Rocky Moss / Joe Theisen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGeorge Jackson / David Neagle vs Benjamin Anderson / Tim Miller3-6, 5-7
2025-03-11vs NorCal/Rasmussen/65&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesLyle Cowen / Randy Tugaw vs Milton Gee / Joe Theisen3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStuart Lum / David Shepard vs Jack Daley / Jeff Fong2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Knee / Tom Schmierer vs John Good / Lance Mock7-5, 6-4
2025-03-06vs NorCal/Rasmussen/65&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesStuart Lum / Tom Schmierer vs Milton Gee / Byron Lee2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Shepard / Gregory Brady vs Benjamin Anderson / Jeff Fong2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLyle Cowen / David Neagle vs Rocky Moss / John Good6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
John Honey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
David Shepard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Dennis E Simmons
published 3.5
David Neagle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Dennis McVey
published 3.5
3.18
Rob Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Aric Clark
published 3.5
2.88
George Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gregory Brady
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Knee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lyle Cowen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Randy Tugaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stuart Lum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tom Schmierer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Honey
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
David Shepard
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Dennis E Simmons
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
David Neagle
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dennis McVey
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Rob Cochran
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Aric Clark
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
George Jackson
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
Gregory Brady
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Knee
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lyle Cowen
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Tugaw
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stuart Lum
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Schmierer
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.