Teams

JOHNSON RANCH CW8.5B

2023 COMBO · Women 8.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Marleen Ten Brink
published
4.38
Claudya Lum
published 4.5
4.35
Ye Chen
published
4.20
Lisa Rothfels
published
4.16
Melissa Cella
published
4.09
McKenzie Helvick
published
4.08
Sasha MacKtinger
published
4.05
Alissa Watts
published 4.5
4.02
Deborah Desousa
published 4.5
3.91
Carolyn Blythe
published 4.5
3.90
Jessica Peers
published
3.79
Lauren Meegan
published
3.79
Staci Ross
published
3.75
Lisa Fitzpatrick
published
3.73
Lisa Miyashiro
published
3.72
Pamela Russo
published
3.69
Cheryl Meegan
published 4
3.61
Christine Hatch
published 4
Joanna Badgley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Staci Ross + Lisa Miyashiro4449% games+2.8% vs expected
McKenzie Helvick + Carolyn Blythe3454% games+2.1% vs expected
Lisa Fitzpatrick + Cheryl Meegan224 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Meegan + Cheryl Meegan314 matchesnot enough data
Ye Chen + McKenzie Helvick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marleen Ten Brink
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Claudya Lum
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
Ye Chen
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
4.35
Lisa Rothfels
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
Melissa Cella
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
McKenzie Helvick
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
4.09
Sasha MacKtinger
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alissa Watts
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Deborah Desousa
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Carolyn Blythe
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.91
Jessica Peers
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Lauren Meegan
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Staci Ross
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Lisa Fitzpatrick
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Lisa Miyashiro
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Pamela Russo
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Cheryl Meegan
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Christine Hatch
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Joanna Badgley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.