Teams

Suchman (Flamingo Park)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 55 & Over - Fall · 6.0 Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-09vs Pariser (Deering Bay)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMeriden Gelb / Anne Manning vs Cathy Pariser / Marla Ferreira3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Montoya / Elaine Richardson vs Sara Klein / Isabel Fontecilla3-6, 4-6
2022-11-07vs Thayer (Coral Reef)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMeriden Gelb / Brooke Thomas vs Esperanza Bonner / Yolanda Sosa5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Perez / Marcia Montoya vs Jackie Thayer / Trisha Fuerst5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-31vs Swank (Salvadore Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Gill / Meriden Gelb vs Vickie Krall / Mina Schultes2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Miller / Marcia Montoya vs Christine Edwards / Zelda Jensen1-6, 2-6
2022-10-30vs Pariser (Deering Bay)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarcia Montoya / Betsy Perez vs Maria McDonald / Maria Feldman2-6, 0-6
2022-10-17Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMelinda Berman / Meriden Gelb vs Jackie Thayer / Claudia Gomes6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilma Rascoe / Florence Silberman vs Carol Knotts / Michelle Sarason4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBonnie Crabtree / Wilma Rascoe vs Marilda del Rey / Mina Schultes1-6, 5-7
2022-10-06vs Thayer (Coral Reef)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWilma Rascoe / Meriden Gelb vs Holly Orzechowicz / Yolanda Sosa3-6, 2-6
2022-10-03vs Pariser (Deering Bay)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesWilma Rascoe / Maria Melba Quintero vs Marla Ferreira / Maria Feldman4-6, 1-6
2022-09-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesWilma Rascoe / Debra Leibowitz vs Adrienne Gang / Luanne Boiko6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Betsy Perez
published 3.5
3.05
Melinda Berman
published
3.04
Brooke Thomas
published 3
2.98
Tammie Roodner
published
2.96
Wilma Rascoe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Meriden Gelb
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
Marcia Montoya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wilma Rascoe + Meriden Gelb6649% games+6.7% vs expected
Marcia Montoya + Meriden Gelb4354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betsy Perez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda Berman
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Brooke Thomas
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Tammie Roodner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Wilma Rascoe
78W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Meriden Gelb
93W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcia Montoya
33W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.