Teams

High Strung (UTW)

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 4.5 18s

15 players · average NTRP 4.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 4.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Anna Eberhardt
published 5
4.28
Dianne Lee
published 4.5
4.16
Christina Vogdes
published 4.5
4.12
Ally Sivewright
published 4.5
4.05
Kimberly Leonard
published
4.04
Julie Petrucelli
published
3.99
Jessica Morrow
published
3.87
Shelly Foreman
published
3.86
3.85
Amy Mulvihill
published 4
3.83
Linda Haddox
published
3.69
Tanya Thornton
published
Michelle Graham
published
Stefani Ragsdale
published
Tiffany Muller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Vogdes + Julie Petrucelli443551% games+2.6% vs expected
Kimberly Leonard + Ally Sivewright111451% games+2.2% vs expected
Stefani Ragsdale + Kimberly Leonard2444% games−4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anna Eberhardt
33W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.79
4.5
Dianne Lee
60W–20L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Christina Vogdes
59W–48L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Ally Sivewright
37W–20L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
Kimberly Leonard
19W–30L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
Julie Petrucelli
52W–50L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Jessica Morrow
27W–29L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
Shelly Foreman
56W–59L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Jennifer Petersen
115W–95L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Amy Mulvihill
90W–74L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Linda Haddox
43W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Tanya Thornton
63W–65L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Michelle Graham
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stefani Ragsdale
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tiffany Muller
41W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.