Teams

B2 Salisbury Kim

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTamara Beck Jacquet / Gaurav Shrestha vs Katherine Faraci / Stephen Faraci4-6, 3-6
2022-11-06vs B5 ACAC Romero Double ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Broaddus / Caroline Andrews vs Majd Babik / Alicia Watkins7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-02vs B8 acac Advantage Stephen’s 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Spiller / Gaurav Shrestha vs Greg Deeb / Michelle Nelson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-30vs B3 Burkwood CarterWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Scott Broaddus vs Modestine Carter / Mario Wright6-2, 6-2
2022-10-09vs B6 Bon Air MorrisLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Joseph West vs Anthony Fiorenza / Lynette Villadelgado3-6, 2-6
2022-10-02vs B4 Westwood Cosby CrushersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Joseph West vs Haidee Cline / Walker Reid3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Spiller / David Spiller vs Barbara Hassett / George Brickley6-2, 6-4
2022-09-11vs B9 MTC MeyerLost 01
L#3 DoublesGaurav Shrestha / Tamara Beck Jacquet vs Tom Pollard / Susan Zielinski0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Suzanne Spiller
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Tamara Beck Jacquet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.69
Megan Shrestha
published
3.30
Kristin Kim
published
3.26
Arthur Kim
published 3.5
Dean Deaver
published 3.5
Gaurav Shrestha
published 3.5
3.09
Caroline Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Jessica Steinour
published
3.05
David Spiller
published 3
Joseph West
published
Karen Franks
published
Scott Broaddus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Beck Jacquet + Arthur Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Suzanne Spiller
289W–111L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Tamara Beck Jacquet
59W–106L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
Megan Shrestha
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Kristin Kim
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Arthur Kim
3W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dean Deaver
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gaurav Shrestha
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Andrews
69W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jessica Steinour
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
David Spiller
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
Joseph West
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Franks
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Broaddus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.