Teams

CCRC - Olmstead

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '24 · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-28vs FTC - TrottyWon 30
W#1 DoublesTessa Rowlands / Nadine Brendza vs Rachel Stephens / Danielle Davidson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Davis / Susan Gulledge vs Taylor Childress / Kelsey Cannady6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMandy Harmon / Denise Vaughn vs AnnieB Brown / Lisa Furlong6-2, 6-3
2024-09-16vs RVP - FlandersWon 21
W#1 DoublesTessa Rowlands / Nadine Brendza vs Laurel Jones / Tammy Butcher6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTiffany Padgett / Kimberly Pond vs Denise Daniel / Amy L'Hommedieu4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Olmstead / Denise Vaughn vs Patti Pitts / Kim Smith6-2, 6-1
2024-08-12vs Odell - RogersonWon 31
W#1 DoublesNadine Brendza / Tessa Rowlands vs Kristen Elmshaeuser / Kathleen Rogerson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJudith Sexton / Tracy Conlon vs Agnes Hobson / Faris Connor6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Davis / Jennifer Olmstead vs Brooke Homan / Angie Osbon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesCynthia Learn / Elizabeth Plummer vs Lori Pope / Melissa Bunney7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Tracy Conlon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Gina Konn
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #4 Doubles 7% · published 3.5
3.35
Nadine Brendza
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.30
Tessa Rowlands
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Kimberly Pond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Denise Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Adrienne Davis
published 3.5
3.20
Mandy Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Susan Gulledge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Cynthia Learn
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Preeti Batra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.91
Jennifer Olmstead
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Tiffany Padgett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Judith Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Pam Callaway
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Olmstead + Judith Sexton3251% games+11.3% vs expected
Tessa Rowlands + Nadine Brendza8361% games+10.1% vs expected
Tiffany Padgett + Kimberly Pond5547% games+0.6% vs expected
Cynthia Learn + Kimberly Pond6351% games−3.4% vs expected
Denise Vaughn + Nadine Brendza5354% games−4.3% vs expected
Denise Vaughn + Kimberly Pond4348% games−6.5% vs expected
Cynthia Learn + Tiffany Padgett0639% games−9.4% vs expected
Tracy Conlon + Tessa Rowlands224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Conlon
40W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Gina Konn
93W–47L career · 28 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Nadine Brendza
49W–50L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Tessa Rowlands
15W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Kimberly Pond
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Denise Vaughn
32W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Adrienne Davis
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mandy Harmon
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Susan Gulledge
14W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Cynthia Learn
27W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Preeti Batra
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jennifer Olmstead
50W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Tiffany Padgett
16W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.85
Judith Sexton
21W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Pam Callaway
23W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.