Teams

Graybill/18s/5.5/TCC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.10 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Renwick / Valerie Hadley vs Stephanie Bowman / Kelly Wallace7-6, 7-5
2025-09-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Alario / Megan Kantor vs Megan Bucy / Kristen Nash6-2, 6-3
2025-09-23Split 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Drake / Megan Evans vs Taylor Fortune / Jamie Wynn1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJenna Shamieh / Megan Kantor vs Becky Huval / Katherine Gristina6-4, 6-4
2025-09-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Allison / Valerie Hadley vs Carolyn Miller / Morgan Dore7-6, 6-0
2025-09-02Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Alario / Valerie Hadley vs Crissy Green / Taylor Fortune1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Drake / Megan Kantor vs Mary Glaviano / Beth Almond4-6, 2-6
2025-08-26vs Looper/18s/5.5/BCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesValerie Hadley / Erika Smith vs Camille Pagan / Lauren Parks4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Kantor / Emily Drake vs Amber Tomaszewski / Lea Johnson7-5, 6-2
2025-08-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Renwick / Valerie Hadley vs Jacy Downing / Jessica Hollister3-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Brittany Graybill
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Alexis Shih
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.67
Celia Guillory
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Chanell Charapata
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.64
Danielle Hufft
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Elizabeth Alario
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Emily Drake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Jenna Shamieh
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kristen Muller Clinton
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Lauren Renwick
usually #3 Doubles 72%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Layne Neitzschman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Ann Tusa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Megan Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Kantor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nicole Allison
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Stephanie Nash
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Hadley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celia Guillory + Stephanie Nash5449% gamesnot enough data
Brittany Graybill + Nicole Allison8076% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Allison + Danielle Hufft4163% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Alario + Jenna Shamieh2349% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Allison + Lauren Renwick303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Renwick + Jenna Shamieh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brittany Graybill
29W–10L career · 24 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3
Alexis Shih
14W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Celia Guillory
8W–13L career · 14 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Chanell Charapata
13W–29L career · 20 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Danielle Hufft
19W–27L career · 25 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Elizabeth Alario
9W–15L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Drake
7W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenna Shamieh
17W–16L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Muller Clinton
4W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Renwick
12W–7L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Layne Neitzschman
15W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Ann Tusa
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Evans
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Megan Kantor
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Allison
30W–8L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Nash
28W–16L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Hadley
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.